2016-11-24 20:42 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 2016-11-23 22:58+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> On 23/11/2016 21:25, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
>>> index 25810b144b58..ddd63b8b176e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
>>> @@ -41,6 +41,15 @@ static int kvm_set_pic_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
>>> bool line_status)
>>> {
>>> struct kvm_pic *pic = pic_irqchip(kvm);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * XXX: rejecting pic routes when pic isn't in use would be better,
>>> + * but the default routing table is installed while kvm->arch.vpic is
>>> + * NULL and KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP can race with KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!pic)
>>> + return -1;
>>> +
>>> return kvm_pic_set_irq(pic, e->irqchip.pin, irq_source_id, level);
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> Can you explain the race with the default routing table better? It
>> seems to me that it can only make the routing table go from invalid to
>> valid (there is no KVM_DESTROY_IRQCHIP) so it's benign.
>
> Oops, I wrote the race with wrong IOCTL -- it should be KVM_IRQ_LINE.
>
> 1) set KVM_CAP_SPLIT_IRQCHIP (unlocks KVM_IRQ_LINE)
> a) call KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP (creates routes while !kvm->arch.vpic)
> b) concurrently call KVM_IRQ_LINE for PIO routes (dereferences NULL)
If we should not go through irqfd if irqchip is split?
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
