On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:31:56PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年12月06日 23:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > These fields are 64 bit, using le32_to_cpu and friends
> > on these will not do the right thing.
> > Fix this up.
> >
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index 6120384..22e99c4 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -606,9 +606,9 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
> > return 0;
> > pkt = virtio_transport_alloc_pkt(&info, 0,
> > - le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > + le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_port),
> > - le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > + le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port));
>
> Looking at sockaddr_vm, svm_cid is "unsigned int", do we really want 64 bit
> here?
Can't change the protocol at this point.
> > if (!pkt)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ virtio_transport_send_response(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> > .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RESPONSE,
> > .type = VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM,
> > - .remote_cid = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > + .remote_cid = le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > .remote_port = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port),
> > .reply = true,
> > };
> > @@ -863,9 +863,9 @@ virtio_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk, struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
> > child->sk_state = SS_CONNECTED;
> > vchild = vsock_sk(child);
> > - vsock_addr_init(&vchild->local_addr, le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > + vsock_addr_init(&vchild->local_addr, le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_port));
> > - vsock_addr_init(&vchild->remote_addr, le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > + vsock_addr_init(&vchild->remote_addr, le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port));
> > vsock_insert_connected(vchild);
> > @@ -904,9 +904,9 @@ void virtio_transport_recv_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt)
> > struct sock *sk;
> > bool space_available;
> > - vsock_addr_init(&src, le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > + vsock_addr_init(&src, le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> > le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port));
> > - vsock_addr_init(&dst, le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > + vsock_addr_init(&dst, le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_cid),
> > le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.dst_port));
> > trace_virtio_transport_recv_pkt(src.svm_cid, src.svm_port,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
