Re: [PATCH v3] kvm: svm: Use the hardware provided GPA instead of page walk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/29/2016 12:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Brijesh Singh wrote:
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -5483,3 +5483,11 @@ void emulator_writeback_register_cache(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 {
 	writeback_registers(ctxt);
 }
+
+bool emulator_is_string_op(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
+{
+	if (ctxt->d & String)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}

Do we really need a full function call for this simple thing? Just because
this horrible CamelCase constant is in emulate.c?

What's wrong with moving that thing into a header and make it a trivial
inline:

#define INS_STRING		(1 << 13)

static inline bool emulator_is_string_op(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
{
	return ctxt->d & INS_STRING;
}

Hmm?

One of the recommendation from previous review feedback was to move the check inside emulator.c. I am fine with inlining it into kvm_emulate.h

Hi Paolo,

Do you want me to spin a new version ?

-Brijesh

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux