Re: [PATCH kernel v5 4/6] vfio/spapr: Postpone default window creation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:32:15PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> As mentioned in the previous patch, we are going to allow the userspace
> to configure container in one memory context and pass container fd to
> another so we are postponing memory allocations accounted against
> the locked memory limit. The previous patch took care of it_userspace.
> 
> At the moment we create the default DMA window when the first group is
> attached to a container; this is done for the userspace which is not
> DDW-aware but familiar with the SPAPR TCE IOMMU v2 in the part of memory
> pre-registration - such client expects the default DMA window to exist.
> 
> This postpones the default DMA window allocation till first map/unmap
> request happens.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> index 442baac..1c02498 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct tce_container {
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	bool enabled;
>  	bool v2;
> +	bool def_window_pending;
>  	unsigned long locked_pages;
>  	struct iommu_table *tables[IOMMU_TABLE_GROUP_MAX_TABLES];
>  	struct list_head group_list;
> @@ -594,15 +595,6 @@ static long tce_iommu_create_table(struct tce_container *container,
>  	WARN_ON(!ret && !(*ptbl)->it_ops->free);
>  	WARN_ON(!ret && ((*ptbl)->it_allocated_size != table_size));
>  
> -	if (!ret && container->v2) {
> -		ret = tce_iommu_userspace_view_alloc(*ptbl);
> -		if (ret)
> -			(*ptbl)->it_ops->free(*ptbl);
> -	}

Does this stuff for the user view belong in the previous patch?

> -
> -	if (ret)
> -		decrement_locked_vm(table_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -719,6 +711,29 @@ static long tce_iommu_remove_window(struct tce_container *container,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static long tce_iommu_create_default_window(struct tce_container *container)
> +{
> +	long ret;
> +	__u64 start_addr = 0;
> +	struct tce_iommu_group *tcegrp;
> +	struct iommu_table_group *table_group;
> +
> +	if (!tce_groups_attached(container))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	tcegrp = list_first_entry(&container->group_list,
> +			struct tce_iommu_group, next);
> +	table_group = iommu_group_get_iommudata(tcegrp->grp);
> +	if (!table_group)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = tce_iommu_create_window(container, IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT_4K,
> +			table_group->tce32_size, 1, &start_addr);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret && start_addr);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static long tce_iommu_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  				 unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -809,6 +824,13 @@ static long tce_iommu_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  				VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE))
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> +		if (container->def_window_pending) {
> +			ret = tce_iommu_create_default_window(container);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +			container->def_window_pending = false;

Would it make sense to clear (and maybe test) def_window_pending
within create_default_window()?

> +		}
> +
>  		num = tce_iommu_find_table(container, param.iova, &tbl);
>  		if (num < 0)
>  			return -ENXIO;
> @@ -872,6 +894,13 @@ static long tce_iommu_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  		if (param.flags)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> +		if (container->def_window_pending) {
> +			ret = tce_iommu_create_default_window(container);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return ret;
> +			container->def_window_pending = false;
> +		}
> +
>  		num = tce_iommu_find_table(container, param.iova, &tbl);
>  		if (num < 0)
>  			return -ENXIO;
> @@ -998,6 +1027,8 @@ static long tce_iommu_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&container->lock);
>  
> +		container->def_window_pending = false;

Uh.. why is it cleared here, without calling
tce_iommu_create_default_window() AFAICT?

>  		ret = tce_iommu_create_window(container, create.page_shift,
>  				create.window_size, create.levels,
>  				&create.start_addr);
> @@ -1030,6 +1061,12 @@ static long tce_iommu_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>  		if (remove.flags)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
> +		if (container->def_window_pending && !remove.start_addr) {
> +			container->def_window_pending = false;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		container->def_window_pending = false;
> +
>  		mutex_lock(&container->lock);
>  
>  		ret = tce_iommu_remove_window(container, remove.start_addr);
> @@ -1109,9 +1146,6 @@ static void tce_iommu_release_ownership_ddw(struct tce_container *container,
>  static long tce_iommu_take_ownership_ddw(struct tce_container *container,
>  		struct iommu_table_group *table_group)
>  {
> -	long i, ret = 0;
> -	struct iommu_table *tbl = NULL;
> -
>  	if (!table_group->ops->create_table || !table_group->ops->set_window ||
>  			!table_group->ops->release_ownership) {
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> @@ -1120,47 +1154,9 @@ static long tce_iommu_take_ownership_ddw(struct tce_container *container,
>  
>  	table_group->ops->take_ownership(table_group);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If it the first group attached, check if there is
> -	 * a default DMA window and create one if none as
> -	 * the userspace expects it to exist.
> -	 */
> -	if (!tce_groups_attached(container) && !container->tables[0]) {
> -		ret = tce_iommu_create_table(container,
> -				table_group,
> -				0, /* window number */
> -				IOMMU_PAGE_SHIFT_4K,
> -				table_group->tce32_size,
> -				1, /* default levels */
> -				&tbl);
> -		if (ret)
> -			goto release_exit;
> -		else
> -			container->tables[0] = tbl;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Set all windows to the new group */
> -	for (i = 0; i < IOMMU_TABLE_GROUP_MAX_TABLES; ++i) {
> -		tbl = container->tables[i];
> -
> -		if (!tbl)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		/* Set the default window to a new group */
> -		ret = table_group->ops->set_window(table_group, i, tbl);

Uh... nothing in the new code seems to replace these set_window (and
unset_window) calls.  What's up with that?

> -		if (ret)
> -			goto release_exit;
> -	}
> +	container->def_window_pending = true;
>  
>  	return 0;
> -
> -release_exit:
> -	for (i = 0; i < IOMMU_TABLE_GROUP_MAX_TABLES; ++i)
> -		table_group->ops->unset_window(table_group, i);
> -
> -	table_group->ops->release_ownership(table_group);
> -
> -	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int tce_iommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux