On 18/11/2016 19:20, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Am 17.11.2016 um 15:55 schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> kvm_arch_set_irq is unused since commit b97e6de9c96. Merge >> its functionality with kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic. >> >> Reported-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > As you said, it is unused. Therefore the functionality is superfluous. > Why merge it? Because we can handle Hyper-V synthetic interrupts atomically, and that was the intended usage of kvm_arch_set_irq's code (see commit c9a5eccac1ab, "kvm/eventfd: add arch-specific set_irq", 2015-10-16). What happened was that the API changed between commit c9a5eccac1ab and the merge of the Hyper-V synthetic interrupt patches, and the latter was not adjusted. Paolo > We can still introduce this later if we ever need it. Or do you have a > concrete user in mind? > > The patch in general looks good to me. Just wondering if we can't simply > rip out that single function. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
