Hi Drew,
On 18/11/16 13:06, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> I'm so pleased to see this series. Thank you!
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:57:49PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> This adds an MMIO subtest to the GIC test.
>> It accesses some generic GICv2 registers and does some sanity tests,
>> like checking for some of them being read-only.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arm/gic.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++++
>> lib/arm/asm/gic.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
>> index 638b8b1..ba2585b 100644
>> --- a/arm/gic.c
>> +++ b/arm/gic.c
>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>> *
>> * GICv2
>> * + test sending/receiving IPIs
>> + * + MMIO access tests
>> * GICv3
>> * + test sending/receiving IPIs
>> *
>> @@ -274,6 +275,98 @@ static struct gic gicv3 = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +static bool test_ro_pattern_32(void *address, u32 pattern, u32 orig)
>> +{
>> + u32 reg;
>> +
>> + writel(pattern, address);
>> + reg = readl(address);
>> +
>> + if (reg != orig)
>> + writel(orig, address);
>> +
>> + return reg == orig;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool test_readonly_32(void *address, bool razwi)
>> +{
>> + u32 orig, pattern;
>> +
>> + orig = readl(address);
>> + if (razwi && orig)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + pattern = 0xffffffff;
>> + if (orig != pattern) {
>> + if (!test_ro_pattern_32(address, pattern, orig))
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pattern = 0xa5a55a5a;
>> + if (orig != pattern) {
>> + if (!test_ro_pattern_32(address, pattern, orig))
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pattern = 0;
>> + if (orig != pattern) {
>> + if (!test_ro_pattern_32(address, pattern, orig))
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool test_typer_v2(uint32_t reg)
>> +{
>> + int nr_gic_cpus = ((reg >> 5) & 0x7) + 1;
>> +
>> + report("all %d CPUs have interrupts", nr_cpus == nr_gic_cpus,
>> + nr_gic_cpus);
>> +
>> + return true;
>
> This test function can be a void.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int gic_test_mmio(int gic_version)
>> +{
>> + u32 reg;
>> + int nr_irqs;
>> + void *gic_dist_base, *idreg;
>> +
>> + switch(gic_version) {
>> + case 0x2:
>> + gic_dist_base = gicv2_dist_base();
>> + idreg = gic_dist_base + 0xfe8;
>
> I see below you introduce GICD_ICPIDR2, so I guess you can use it here.
>
>> + break;
>> + case 0x3:
>> + report_abort("GICv3 MMIO tests NYI");
>> + return -1;
>
> can't reach this return
But we need to tell GCC about this, because otherwise we get all kind of
warnings (including bogus "maybe unused" warnings).
__attribute__ ((noreturn)) seems the way to go here, but this is
currently giving me a hard time ...
>> + default:
>> + report_abort("GIC version %d not supported", gic_version);
>> + return 0;
>
> can't reach this return
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + reg = readl(gic_dist_base + GICD_TYPER);
>> + nr_irqs = 32 * ((reg & 0x1f) + 1);
>
> Any reason to avoid using GICD_TYPER_IRQS() here?
On the first write I wasn't aware of it, on a second thought then I
wanted to avoid using the macro copied from Linux.
But you are right, I will use it here.
>
>> + report("number of implemented SPIs: %d", 1, nr_irqs - 32);
>
> We usually just use printf for informational output (but we should
> probably add a 'report_info' in order to keep the prefixes. I can
> do that now.) Anyway, please s/1/true
I saw your patch, will use that.
>> +
>> + test_typer_v2(reg);
>> +
>> + report("IIDR: 0x%x", 1, readl(gic_dist_base + GICD_IIDR));
>> +
>> + report("GICD_TYPER is read-only",
>> + test_readonly_32(gic_dist_base + GICD_TYPER, false));
>> + report("GICD_IIDR is read-only",
>> + test_readonly_32(gic_dist_base + GICD_IIDR, false));
>> +
>> + reg = readl(idreg);
>> + report("ICPIDR2 is read-only (0x%x)",
>> + test_readonly_32(idreg, false),
>> + reg);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>
> You may want %08x for all your register printing.
>
> Since you either abort or always return success, then this function can be
> a void.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>> char pfx[8];
>> @@ -332,6 +425,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> }
>> ipi_test();
>>
>> + } else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "mmio")) {
>> + report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>> +
>> + gic_test_mmio(gic_version());
>
> Any reason to pass gic_version() here instead of just using it
> in gic_test_mmio?
Not really, I originally wanted to pass this variable on in a clean
fashion to allow sharing tests.
But using the function shouldn't make any difference anymore, so I can
easily replace it.
"Yes, will fix" to all the other comments.
Thanks for having a look!
Cheers,
Andre.
>> +
>> + report_prefix_pop();
>> } else {
>> report_abort("Unknown subtest '%s'", argv[1]);
>> }
>> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
>> index c7392c7..0162e5a 100644
>> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
>> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
>> @@ -67,6 +67,12 @@ smp = $((($MAX_SMP < 8)?$MAX_SMP:8))
>> extra_params = -machine gic-version=2 -append 'ipi'
>> groups = gic
>>
>> +[gicv2-mmio]
>> +file = gic.flat
>> +smp = $((($MAX_SMP < 8)?$MAX_SMP:8))
>> +extra_params = -machine gic-version=2 -append 'mmio'
>> +groups = gic
>> +
>> [gicv3-ipi]
>> file = gic.flat
>> smp = $MAX_SMP
>> diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/gic.h b/lib/arm/asm/gic.h
>> index c2267b6..cef748d 100644
>> --- a/lib/arm/asm/gic.h
>> +++ b/lib/arm/asm/gic.h
>> @@ -10,10 +10,12 @@
>> /* Distributor registers */
>> #define GICD_CTLR 0x0000
>> #define GICD_TYPER 0x0004
>> +#define GICD_IIDR 0x0008
>> #define GICD_IGROUPR 0x0080
>> #define GICD_ISENABLER 0x0100
>> #define GICD_IPRIORITYR 0x0400
>> #define GICD_SGIR 0x0f00
>> +#define GICD_ICPIDR2 0x0fe8
>>
>> #define GICD_TYPER_IRQS(typer) ((((typer) & 0x1f) + 1) * 32)
>> #define GICD_INT_EN_SET_SGI 0x0000ffff
>> --
>> 2.9.0
>>
>>
>
> Thanks,
> drew
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
