Re: [qemu patch V2 2/2] kvmclock: reduce kvmclock difference on migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:15:13PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:16:09PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:15:35PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:11:26PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:24:13AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > > Check for KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK capability KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE, which
> > > > > indicates that KVM_GET_CLOCK returns a value as seen by the guest at
> > > > > that moment.
> > > > > 
> > > > > For new machine types, use this value rather than reading 
> > > > > from guest memory.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This reduces kvmclock difference on migration from 5s to 0.1s
> > > > > (when max_downtime == 5s).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > 
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  hw/i386/kvm/clock.c    |  108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > >  include/hw/i386/pc.h   |    5 ++
> > > > >  target-i386/kvm.c      |    7 +++
> > > > >  target-i386/kvm_i386.h |    1 
> > > > >  4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2: 
> > > > > - improve variable names (Juan)
> > > > > - consolidate code on kvm_get_clock function (Paolo)
> > > > > - return mach_use_reliable_get_clock from needed function (Paolo)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Index: qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c
> > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > --- qemu-mig-advance-clock.orig/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c	2016-11-14 10:40:39.748116312 -0200
> > > > > +++ qemu-mig-advance-clock/hw/i386/kvm/clock.c	2016-11-14 13:38:29.299955042 -0200
> > > > > @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@
> > > > >  
> > > > >      uint64_t clock;
> > > > >      bool clock_valid;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    /* whether machine supports reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > > > > +    bool mach_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    /* whether source host supported reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK */
> > > > > +    bool src_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > > > >  } KVMClockState;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info {
> > > > > @@ -81,6 +87,19 @@
> > > > >      return nsec + time.system_time;
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static uint64_t kvm_get_clock(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +    struct kvm_clock_data data;
> > > > > +    int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_GET_CLOCK, &data);
> > > > > +    if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > +        fprintf(stderr, "KVM_GET_CLOCK failed: %s\n", strerror(ret));
> > > > > +                abort();
> > > > > +    }
> > > > > +    return data.clock;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > >  static void kvmclock_vm_state_change(void *opaque, int running,
> > > > >                                       RunState state)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > @@ -91,15 +110,37 @@
> > > > >  
> > > > >      if (running) {
> > > > >          struct kvm_clock_data data = {};
> > > > > -        uint64_t time_at_migration = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > > > > +        uint64_t pvclock_via_mem = 0;
> > > > >  
> > > > > -        s->clock_valid = false;
> > > > > +        /* local (running VM) restore */
> > > > > +        if (s->clock_valid) {
> > > > > +            /*
> > > > > +             * if host does not support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > > > > +             * read kvmclock value from memory
> > > > > +             */
> > > > > +            if (!kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > > > > +                pvclock_via_mem = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > > > > +            }
> > > > > +        /* migration/savevm/init restore */
> > > > > +        } else {
> > > > > +            /*
> > > > > +             * use s->clock in case machine uses reliable
> > > > > +             * get clock and source host supported
> > > > > +             * reliable get clock
> > > > > +             */
> > > > > +            if (!(s->mach_use_reliable_get_clock &&
> > > > > +                  s->src_use_reliable_get_clock)) {
> > > > > +                pvclock_via_mem = kvmclock_current_nsec(s);
> > > > > +            }
> > > > 
> > > > The s->mach_use_reliable_get_clock check seems redundant.
> > > > src_use_reliable_get_clock is set only if
> > > > mach_use_reliable_get_clock is true.
> > > 
> > > Done.
> > > 
> > > > > +        }
> > > > >  
> > > > > -        /* We can't rely on the migrated clock value, just discard it */
> > > > > -        if (time_at_migration) {
> > > > > -            s->clock = time_at_migration;
> > > > > +        /* We can't rely on the saved clock value, just discard it */
> > > > > +        if (pvclock_via_mem) {
> > > > > +            s->clock = pvclock_via_mem;
> > > > >          }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +        s->clock_valid = false;
> > > > > +
> > > > >          data.clock = s->clock;
> > > > >          ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_SET_CLOCK, &data);
> > > > >          if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > @@ -120,8 +161,6 @@
> > > > >              }
> > > > >          }
> > > > >      } else {
> > > > > -        struct kvm_clock_data data;
> > > > > -        int ret;
> > > > >  
> > > > >          if (s->clock_valid) {
> > > > >              return;
> > > > > @@ -129,13 +168,7 @@
> > > > >  
> > > > >          kvm_synchronize_all_tsc();
> > > > >  
> > > > > -        ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_GET_CLOCK, &data);
> > > > > -        if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > -            fprintf(stderr, "KVM_GET_CLOCK failed: %s\n", strerror(ret));
> > > > > -            abort();
> > > > > -        }
> > > > > -        s->clock = data.clock;
> > > > > -
> > > > > +        s->clock = kvm_get_clock();
> > > > >          /*
> > > > >           * If the VM is stopped, declare the clock state valid to
> > > > >           * avoid re-reading it on next vmsave (which would return
> > > > > @@ -152,22 +185,69 @@
> > > > >      qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(kvmclock_vm_state_change, s);
> > > > >  }
> > > > >  
> > > > > +static bool kvmclock_src_use_reliable_get_clock(void *opaque)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +    KVMClockState *s = opaque;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    /*
> > > > > +     * On machine types that support reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > > > > +     * if host kernel does provide reliable KVM_GET_CLOCK,
> > > > > +     * set src_use_reliable_get_clock=true so that destination
> > > > > +     * avoids reading kvmclock from memory.
> > > > > +     */
> > > > > +    if (s->mach_use_reliable_get_clock && kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()) {
> > > > > +        s->src_use_reliable_get_clock = true;
> > > > > +    }
> > > > 
> > > > It feels fragile to change device state inside the .needed
> > > > function. Better to initialize src_use_reliable_get_clock on
> > > > kvmclock_realize()?
> > > > 
> > > > What exactly ensures src_use_reliable_get_clock is correctly
> > > > initialized on the migration destination as well?
> > > 
> > > Its initialized to false (because its part of device state).
> > 
> > Do you mean it is always going to be false on the destination
> > host? What if .needed is called by other code? .needed shouldn't
> > have any side-effects.
> 
> I don't think needed is called by any other code.

I don't know if it is called. But it may be called by other code,
so it can't have side-effects.

> 
> > Also, the difference between the variables on the destination and
> > the source is very confusing, see other comments below:
> 
> Yes it is: its because you don't know when is what. But if you consider
> separate events:
> 
>     initialization, incoming migration, vmstop, vmcontinue.
> 
> And the values of the variables for each case, then it becomes 
> clear.
> 
> If anyone has a suggestion to improve clarify, its welcome.

I think it was confusing when src_use_reliable_get_clock was
initialized on .needed, but now it makes sense to me because
mach_use_reliable_get_clock and src_use_reliable_get_clock have
the same value on source and destination.

> 
> > > > 
> > > > > +
> > > > > +    return s->mach_use_reliable_get_clock;
> > > > 
> > > > If if kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable() is false, isn't it simpler to
> > > > simply skip the section?
> > > > 
> > > > It looks like mach_use_reliable_get_clock and
> > > > src_use_reliable_get_clock could become a single field:
> > > > 
> > > > * use_reliable_get_clock ("x-use-reliable-get-clock" property)
> > > >   set to true by default (set on DEFINE_PROP_BOOL parameter)
> > > > * "x-use-reliable-get-clock" set to false by default on older
> > > >   machine-types
> > > > * use_reliable_get_clock forced to false on kvmclock_realize() if
> > > >   !kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable()
> > > > * kvmclock_reliable_get_clock.needed return s->use_reliable_get_clock
> > > 
> > > No because use_reliable_get_clock can be false because the destination host
> > > does not support kvm_has_adjust_clock_stable(), but the source host
> > > supports it (so we want to use the value in the first incoming
> > > migration).
> > > 
> > 
> > Are you talking about the value of the fields on the source host,
> > or on the destination host? In this case, you mean that
> > use_reliable_get_clock should be false on the destination, right?
> 
> Yes, destination.
> 
> > > So the variable indicates whether the source host supported
> > > migration, not whether the destination supports it.
> > 
> > Good, that's the whole point of the field, isn't it? I will try
> > to summarize all cases below. Please correct me if something is
> > incorrect.
> 
> Yes. So in this case, the cleanup/simplification to use a single
> variable is not possible (or maybe it is, but it just complicates
> things).
> 
> > --------+------------+---------------+-----------+------------+
> >         | kvm_has_adj_clock_stable() | use_reliable_get_clock |
> > machine | src        | dst           | src       | dst        |
> > --------+------------+---------------+-----------+------------+
> > pc-2.8  | false      | false         | false     | false      |
> > pc-2.8  | false      | true          | false     | false (*)  |
> > pc-2.8  | true       | false         | true      | true (**)  |
> > pc-2.8  | true       | true          | true      | true       |
> > --------+------------+---------------+-----------+------------+
> > pc-2.7  | (any)      | (any)         | false     | false      |
> > --------+------------+---------------+-----------+------------+
> > 
> > (*) I guess this is where things would break if we skip the
> >     subsection (and use a single field). If the subsection is
> >     skipped, use_reliable_get_clock would be set to true on the
> >     destination. (See my comment below on the new patch you sent)
> 
> Well, perhaps you can massage things so that it works 
> without sending subsection (that is):
> 
>     * Send subsection only in case value is true.
>     * Do not send subsection in case value is false (then treat
>       non presence of subsection and mach_reliable_clock=true 
>       to mean source did not support kvm_has_reliable_clock).

Yes, it would be more complex. Always sending it if
mach_use_reliable_get_clock=true (like you proposed) is simpler.

> 
> Once you agree on "send a subsection for both cases", then you 
> handle it.
> 
> The code is there, its simple, readable, so...
> 
> (what you can't do is to unify src_use_get_reliable_clock (remote 
> information), and local information). Because you need 
> to know both things to be able to handle the 4 cases properly on 
> incoming migration.

OK.

> [...]

-- 
Eduardo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux