Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] arm/arm64: introduce is_aarch32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:45:41PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:45:44PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > So I don't think we should try to distinguish ARMv8-A AArch32 from
> > ARMv7-A. We should test individual features, or if that's not possible,
> > group them in the same bucket.
> 
> Perhaps I was too quick to look for a general way to approach the first
> place I saw the need, which is
> 
>  check_cntr(read_pmccntr());
>  if (is_aarch64())
>      check_cntr(read_pmccntr64());
> 
> Is PMCCNTR the only "weird" difference?

Define "weird". ;)

I believe the extension of PMCCNTR to 64 bits is part of PMUv3. So you
should be able to check ID_DFR0.PerfMon == 0b0011. For overflow you'll
also need to configure PMCR.LC.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux