On 11/17/2016 8:57 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:35:38 +0800 > Jike Song <jike.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 11/17/2016 04:46 AM, Kirti Wankhede wrote: >>> Add a notifier calback to parent's ops structure of mdev device so that per >>> device notifer for vfio module is registered through vfio_mdev module. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <cjia@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Change-Id: Iafa6f1721aecdd6e50eb93b153b5621e6d29b637 >>> --- >>> drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> include/linux/mdev.h | 9 +++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >> >> Hi Alex, Kirti, >> >> Since everyone agreed we should let the vendor driver call vfio_register_notifier >> directly, can you drop this patch from merging? So that I don't need to send a >> reverse patch. > > This seems like a reasonable request to me, this patch drops cleanly > from the series. Any objection Kirti? It seems like it removes a > little bit of pre-release churn from the API. Thanks, > This is independent patch, I don't have any concern to drop this patch. Small nit: Since Documentation patch is later in series, its mentioned in the doc. One line need to be removed from vfio-mediated-device.txt. --- a/Documentation/vfio-mediated-device.txt +++ b/Documentation/vfio-mediated-device.txt @@ -150,7 +150,6 @@ The callbacks in the parent_ops structure are as follows: * read : read emulation callback * write: write emulation callback * mmap: mmap emulation callback -* notifier: notifier callback Thanks, Kirti -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
