On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:50:03AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 07:05:47PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:57:10PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 05:07:43PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > > + > > > > +/* the index should match to the type value */ > > > > +static const char *virtio_pstore_file_prefix[] = { > > > > + "unknown-", /* VIRTIO_PSTORE_TYPE_UNKNOWN */ > > > > > > Is there value in treating everything unexpected as "unknown" > > > and rotating them as if they were logs? > > > It might be better to treat everything that's not known > > > as guest error. > > > > I was thinking about the version mismatch between the kernel and qemu. > > I'd like to make the device can deal with a new kernel version which > > might implement a new pstore message type. It will be saved as > > unknown but the kernel can read it properly later. > > Well it'll have a different prefix. E.g. if kernel has > two different types they will end up in the same > file, hardly what was wanted. Right, I think it needs to add 'type' info to the filename for unknown type. Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html