Re: [PATCH v12 10/22] vfio iommu type1: Add support for mediated devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 21:12:24 +0530
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> VFIO IOMMU drivers are designed for the devices which are IOMMU capable.
> Mediated device only uses IOMMU APIs, the underlying hardware can be
> managed by an IOMMU domain.
> 
> Aim of this change is:
> - To use most of the code of TYPE1 IOMMU driver for mediated devices
> - To support direct assigned device and mediated device in single module
> 
> This change adds pin and unpin support for mediated device to TYPE1 IOMMU
> backend module. More details:
> - Domain for external user is tracked separately in vfio_iommu structure.
>   It is allocated when group for first mdev device is attached.
> - Pages pinned for external domain are tracked in each vfio_dma structure
>   for that iova range.
> - Page tracking rb-tree in vfio_dma keeps <iova, pfn, ref_count>. Key of
>   rb-tree is iova, but it actually aims to track pfns.
> - On external pin request for an iova, page is pinned only once, if iova
>   is already pinned and tracked, ref_count is incremented.

This is referring only to the external (ie. pfn_list) tracking only,
correct?  In general, a page can be pinned up to twice per iova
referencing it, once for an iommu mapped domain and again in the
pfn_list, right?

> - External unin request unpins pages only when ref_count is 0.
             ^^^^ unpin

> - Pinned pages list is used to verify unpinning request and to unpin
>   remaining pages while detaching the group for that device.
> - Page accounting is updated to account in its address space where the
>   pages are pinned/unpinned, i.e dma->task
> -  Accouting for mdev device is only done if there is no iommu capable
>   domain in the container. When there is a direct device assigned to the
>   container and that domain is iommu capable, all pages are already pinned
>   during DMA_MAP.
> - Page accouting is updated on hot plug and unplug mdev device and pass
>   through device.
> 
> Tested by assigning below combinations of devices to a single VM:
> - GPU pass through only
> - vGPU device only
> - One GPU pass through and one vGPU device
> - Linux VM hot plug and unplug vGPU device while GPU pass through device
>   exist
> - Linux VM hot plug and unplug GPU pass through device while vGPU device
>   exist
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Neo Jia <cjia@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Change-Id: I295d6f0f2e0579b8d9882bfd8fd5a4194b97bd9a
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 587 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 526 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 50aca95cf61e..2697d874dd35 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
>  #include <linux/vfio.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
> +#include <linux/mdev.h>
>  
>  #define DRIVER_VERSION  "0.2"
>  #define DRIVER_AUTHOR   "Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>"
> @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_hugepages,
>  
>  struct vfio_iommu {
>  	struct list_head	domain_list;
> +	struct vfio_domain	*external_domain; /* domain for external user */
>  	struct mutex		lock;
>  	struct rb_root		dma_list;
>  	bool			v2;
> @@ -76,7 +78,9 @@ struct vfio_dma {
>  	unsigned long		vaddr;		/* Process virtual addr */
>  	size_t			size;		/* Map size (bytes) */
>  	int			prot;		/* IOMMU_READ/WRITE */
> +	bool			iommu_mapped;
>  	struct task_struct	*task;
> +	struct rb_root		pfn_list;	/* Ex-user pinned pfn list */
>  };
>  
>  struct vfio_group {
> @@ -85,6 +89,21 @@ struct vfio_group {
>  };
>  
>  /*
> + * Guest RAM pinning working set or DMA target
> + */
> +struct vfio_pfn {
> +	struct rb_node		node;
> +	dma_addr_t		iova;		/* Device address */
> +	unsigned long		pfn;		/* Host pfn */
> +	atomic_t		ref_count;
> +};
> +
> +#define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)	\
> +					(!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
> +
> +static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot);
> +
> +/*
>   * This code handles mapping and unmapping of user data buffers
>   * into DMA'ble space using the IOMMU
>   */
> @@ -132,6 +151,97 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
>  	rb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Helper Functions for host iova-pfn list
> + */
> +static struct vfio_pfn *vfio_find_vpfn(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +	struct rb_node *node = dma->pfn_list.rb_node;
> +
> +	while (node) {
> +		vpfn = rb_entry(node, struct vfio_pfn, node);
> +
> +		if (iova < vpfn->iova)
> +			node = node->rb_left;
> +		else if (iova > vpfn->iova)
> +			node = node->rb_right;
> +		else
> +			return vpfn;
> +	}
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_link_pfn(struct vfio_dma *dma,
> +			  struct vfio_pfn *new)
> +{
> +	struct rb_node **link, *parent = NULL;
> +	struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +
> +	link = &dma->pfn_list.rb_node;
> +	while (*link) {
> +		parent = *link;
> +		vpfn = rb_entry(parent, struct vfio_pfn, node);
> +
> +		if (new->iova < vpfn->iova)
> +			link = &(*link)->rb_left;
> +		else
> +			link = &(*link)->rb_right;
> +	}
> +
> +	rb_link_node(&new->node, parent, link);
> +	rb_insert_color(&new->node, &dma->pfn_list);
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_unlink_pfn(struct vfio_dma *dma, struct vfio_pfn *old)
> +{
> +	rb_erase(&old->node, &dma->pfn_list);
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_add_to_pfn_list(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
> +				unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +
> +	vpfn = kzalloc(sizeof(*vpfn), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vpfn)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	vpfn->iova = iova;
> +	vpfn->pfn = pfn;
> +	atomic_set(&vpfn->ref_count, 1);
> +	vfio_link_pfn(dma, vpfn);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_remove_from_pfn_list(struct vfio_dma *dma,
> +				      struct vfio_pfn *vpfn)
> +{
> +	vfio_unlink_pfn(dma, vpfn);
> +	kfree(vpfn);
> +}
> +
> +static struct vfio_pfn *vfio_iova_get_vfio_pfn(struct vfio_dma *dma,
> +					       unsigned long iova)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova);
> +
> +	if (vpfn)
> +		atomic_inc(&vpfn->ref_count);
> +	return vpfn;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iova_put_vfio_pfn(struct vfio_dma *dma, struct vfio_pfn *vpfn)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&vpfn->ref_count)) {
> +		ret = put_pfn(vpfn->pfn, dma->prot);
> +		vfio_remove_from_pfn_list(dma, vpfn);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  struct vwork {
>  	struct mm_struct	*mm;
>  	long			npage;
> @@ -270,7 +380,6 @@ static int vaddr_get_pfn(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr,
>  	}
>  
>  	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> -
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -280,28 +389,35 @@ static int vaddr_get_pfn(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr,
>   * first page and all consecutive pages with the same locking.
>   */
>  static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> -				  long npage, int prot, unsigned long *pfn_base)
> +				  long npage, unsigned long *pfn_base)
>  {
>  	unsigned long limit;
>  	bool lock_cap = ns_capable(task_active_pid_ns(dma->task)->user_ns,
>  				   CAP_IPC_LOCK);
>  	struct mm_struct *mm;
> -	long ret, i;
> +	long ret, i, lock_acct = 0;
>  	bool rsvd;
> +	struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +	dma_addr_t iova;
>  
>  	mm = get_task_mm(dma->task);
>  	if (!mm)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, prot, pfn_base);
> +	ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, dma->prot, pfn_base);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto pin_pg_remote_exit;
>  
> +	iova = vaddr - dma->vaddr + dma->iova;
> +	vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova);
> +	if (!vpfn)
> +		lock_acct = 1;
> +
>  	rsvd = is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base);
>  	limit = task_rlimit(dma->task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> -	if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + 1 > limit) {
> -		put_pfn(*pfn_base, prot);
> +	if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + lock_acct > limit) {
> +		put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
>  		pr_warn("%s: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n", __func__,
>  			limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -310,7 +426,7 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
>  
>  	if (unlikely(disable_hugepages)) {
>  		if (!rsvd)
> -			vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, 1);
> +			vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, lock_acct);
>  		ret = 1;
>  		goto pin_pg_remote_exit;
>  	}
> @@ -319,18 +435,24 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
>  	for (i = 1, vaddr += PAGE_SIZE; i < npage; i++, vaddr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>  		unsigned long pfn = 0;
>  
> -		ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, prot, &pfn);
> +		ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, dma->prot, &pfn);
>  		if (ret)
>  			break;
>  
>  		if (pfn != *pfn_base + i ||
>  		    rsvd != is_invalid_reserved_pfn(pfn)) {
> -			put_pfn(pfn, prot);
> +			put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + i + 1 > limit) {
> -			put_pfn(pfn, prot);
> +		iova = vaddr - dma->vaddr + dma->iova;


nit, this could be incremented in the for loop just like vaddr, we
don't need to create it from scratch (iova += PAGE_SIZE).


> +		vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova);
> +		if (!vpfn)
> +			lock_acct++;
> +
> +		if (!rsvd && !lock_cap &&
> +		    mm->locked_vm + lock_acct + 1 > limit) {


lock_acct was incremented just above, why is this lock_acct + 1?  I
think we're off by one here (ie. remove the +1)?

> +			put_pfn(pfn, dma->prot);
>  			pr_warn("%s: RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n",
>  				__func__, limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
>  			break;
> @@ -338,7 +460,7 @@ static long vfio_pin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!rsvd)
> -		vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, i);
> +		vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, lock_acct);
>  	ret = i;
>  
>  pin_pg_remote_exit:
> @@ -346,14 +468,78 @@ pin_pg_remote_exit:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long pfn,
> -				    long npage, int prot, bool do_accounting)
> +static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
> +				    unsigned long pfn, long npage,
> +				    bool do_accounting)
>  {
> -	unsigned long unlocked = 0;
> +	long unlocked = 0, locked = 0;
>  	long i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++)
> -		unlocked += put_pfn(pfn++, prot);
> +	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
> +		struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +
> +		unlocked += put_pfn(pfn++, dma->prot);
> +
> +		vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova + (i << PAGE_SHIFT));
> +		if (vpfn)
> +			locked++;

This isn't taking into account reserved pages (ex. device mmaps).  In
the pinning path above we skip accounting of reserved pages, put_pfn
also only increments for non-reserved pages, but vfio_find_vpfn()
doesn't care, so it's possible that (locked - unlocked) could result in
a positive value.  Maybe something like:

if (put_pfn(...)) {
	unlocked++;
	if (vfio_find_vpfn(...))
		locked++;
}

> +	}
> +
> +	if (do_accounting)
> +		vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, locked - unlocked);
> +
> +	return unlocked;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_pin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long vaddr,
> +				  unsigned long *pfn_base, bool do_accounting)
> +{
> +	unsigned long limit;
> +	bool lock_cap = ns_capable(task_active_pid_ns(dma->task)->user_ns,
> +				   CAP_IPC_LOCK);
> +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> +	int ret;
> +	bool rsvd;
> +
> +	mm = get_task_mm(dma->task);
> +	if (!mm)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = vaddr_get_pfn(mm, vaddr, dma->prot, pfn_base);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto pin_page_exit;
> +
> +	rsvd = is_invalid_reserved_pfn(*pfn_base);
> +	limit = task_rlimit(dma->task, RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	if (!rsvd && !lock_cap && mm->locked_vm + 1 > limit) {
> +		put_pfn(*pfn_base, dma->prot);
> +		pr_warn("%s: Task %s (%d) RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n",
> +			__func__, dma->task->comm, task_pid_nr(dma->task),
> +			limit << PAGE_SHIFT);
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto pin_page_exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!rsvd && do_accounting)
> +		vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, 1);
> +	ret = 1;
> +
> +pin_page_exit:
> +	mmput(mm);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_unpin_page_external(struct vfio_dma *dma, dma_addr_t iova,
> +				    bool do_accounting)
> +{
> +	int unlocked;
> +	struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = vfio_find_vpfn(dma, iova);
> +
> +	if (!vpfn)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	unlocked = vfio_iova_put_vfio_pfn(dma, vpfn);
>  
>  	if (do_accounting)
>  		vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, -unlocked);
> @@ -361,14 +547,148 @@ static long vfio_unpin_pages_remote(struct vfio_dma *dma, unsigned long pfn,
>  	return unlocked;
>  }
>  
> -static void vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void *iommu_data,
> +				      unsigned long *user_pfn,
> +				      int npage, int prot,
> +				      unsigned long *phys_pfn)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> +	int i, j, ret;
> +	unsigned long remote_vaddr;
> +	unsigned long *pfn = phys_pfn;

nit, why do we have this variable rather than using phys_pfn directly?
Maybe before we had unwind support we incremented this rather than
indexing it?

> +	struct vfio_dma *dma;
> +	bool do_accounting;
> +
> +	if (!iommu || !user_pfn || !phys_pfn)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Supported for v2 version only */
> +	if (!iommu->v2)
> +		return -EACCES;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +
> +	if (!iommu->external_domain) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto pin_done;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If iommu capable domain exist in the container then all pages are
> +	 * already pinned and accounted. Accouting should be done if there is no
> +	 * iommu capable domain in the container.
> +	 */
> +	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
> +		dma_addr_t iova;
> +		struct vfio_pfn *vpfn;
> +
> +		iova = user_pfn[i] << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 0);
> +		if (!dma) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto pin_unwind;
> +		}
> +
> +		if ((dma->prot & prot) != prot) {
> +			pr_info("%s: dma->prot: 0x%x prot: 0x%x\n",
> +				__func__, dma->prot, prot);
> +			ret = -EPERM;
> +			goto pin_unwind;
> +		}
> +
> +		vpfn = vfio_iova_get_vfio_pfn(dma, iova);
> +		if (vpfn) {
> +			pfn[i] = vpfn->pfn;
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		remote_vaddr = dma->vaddr + iova - dma->iova;
> +		ret = vfio_pin_page_external(dma, remote_vaddr, &pfn[i],
> +					     do_accounting);
> +		if (ret <= 0) {
> +			WARN_ON(!ret);
> +			goto pin_unwind;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = vfio_add_to_pfn_list(dma, iova, pfn[i]);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova, do_accounting);
> +			goto pin_unwind;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = i;
> +	goto pin_done;
> +
> +pin_unwind:
> +	pfn[i] = 0;
> +	for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
> +		dma_addr_t iova;
> +
> +		iova = user_pfn[j] << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 0);
> +		vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova, do_accounting);
> +		pfn[j] = 0;
> +	}
> +pin_done:
> +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages(void *iommu_data,
> +					unsigned long *user_pfn,
> +					int npage)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> +	bool do_accounting;
> +	int unlocked = 0, i;
> +
> +	if (!iommu || !user_pfn)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Supported for v2 version only */
> +	if (!iommu->v2)
> +		return -EACCES;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> +
> +	if (!iommu->external_domain) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	do_accounting = !IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu);
> +	for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
> +		struct vfio_dma *dma;
> +		dma_addr_t iova;
> +
> +		iova = user_pfn[i] << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +		dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 0);
> +		if (!dma)
> +			goto unpin_exit;
> +		unlocked += vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova, do_accounting);
> +	}
> +
> +unpin_exit:
> +	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +	return unlocked;

This is not returning what it's supposed to.  unlocked is going to be
less than or equal to the number of pages unpinned.  We don't need to
track unlocked, I think we're just tracking where we are in the unpin
array, whether it was partial or complete.  I think we want:

return i > npage ? npage : i;

Or maybe we can make it more obvious if there's an error on the first
unpin entry:

return i > npage ? npage : (i > 0 ? i : -EINVAL);

> +}
> +
> +static long vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
> +			     bool do_accounting)
>  {
>  	dma_addr_t iova = dma->iova, end = dma->iova + dma->size;
>  	struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
>  	long unlocked = 0;
>  
>  	if (!dma->size)
> -		return;
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * We use the IOMMU to track the physical addresses, otherwise we'd
>  	 * need a much more complicated tracking system.  Unfortunately that
> @@ -410,20 +730,26 @@ static void vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
>  		if (WARN_ON(!unmapped))
>  			break;
>  
> -		unlocked += vfio_unpin_pages_remote(dma, phys >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> +		unlocked += vfio_unpin_pages_remote(dma, iova,
> +						    phys >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>  						    unmapped >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> -						    dma->prot, false);
> +						    false);
>  		iova += unmapped;
>  
>  		cond_resched();
>  	}
>  
> -	vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, -unlocked);
> +	dma->iommu_mapped = false;
> +	if (do_accounting) {
> +		vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, -unlocked);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +	return unlocked;
>  }
>  
>  static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
>  {
> -	vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma);
> +	vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, true);
>  	vfio_unlink_dma(iommu, dma);
>  	put_task_struct(dma->task);
>  	kfree(dma);
> @@ -606,8 +932,7 @@ static int vfio_pin_map_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
>  	while (size) {
>  		/* Pin a contiguous chunk of memory */
>  		npage = vfio_pin_pages_remote(dma, vaddr + dma->size,
> -					      size >> PAGE_SHIFT, dma->prot,
> -					      &pfn);
> +					      size >> PAGE_SHIFT, &pfn);
>  		if (npage <= 0) {
>  			WARN_ON(!npage);
>  			ret = (int)npage;
> @@ -618,8 +943,8 @@ static int vfio_pin_map_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
>  		ret = vfio_iommu_map(iommu, iova + dma->size, pfn, npage,
>  				     dma->prot);
>  		if (ret) {
> -			vfio_unpin_pages_remote(dma, pfn, npage,
> -						 dma->prot, true);
> +			vfio_unpin_pages_remote(dma, iova + dma->size, pfn,
> +						npage, true);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -627,6 +952,8 @@ static int vfio_pin_map_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
>  		dma->size += npage << PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	}
>  
> +	dma->iommu_mapped = true;
> +
>  	if (ret)
>  		vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
>  
> @@ -682,11 +1009,16 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  	dma->prot = prot;
>  	get_task_struct(current);
>  	dma->task = current;
> +	dma->pfn_list = RB_ROOT;
>  
>  	/* Insert zero-sized and grow as we map chunks of it */
>  	vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
>  
> -	ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
> +	/* Don't pin and map if container doesn't contain IOMMU capable domain*/
> +	if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu))
> +		dma->size = size;
> +	else
> +		ret = vfio_pin_map_dma(iommu, dma, size);
>  do_map_err:
>  	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>  	return ret;
> @@ -715,10 +1047,6 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  	d = list_first_entry(&iommu->domain_list, struct vfio_domain, next);
>  	n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
>  
> -	/* If there's not a domain, there better not be any mappings */
> -	if (WARN_ON(n && !d))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
>  		struct vfio_dma *dma;
>  		dma_addr_t iova;
> @@ -727,21 +1055,49 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  		iova = dma->iova;
>  
>  		while (iova < dma->iova + dma->size) {
> -			phys_addr_t phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain, iova);
> +			phys_addr_t phys;
>  			size_t size;
>  
> -			if (WARN_ON(!phys)) {
> -				iova += PAGE_SIZE;
> -				continue;
> +			if (dma->iommu_mapped) {
> +				phys_addr_t p;
> +				dma_addr_t i;
> +
> +				phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain, iova);
> +
> +				if (WARN_ON(!phys)) {
> +					iova += PAGE_SIZE;
> +					continue;
> +				}
> +
> +				size = PAGE_SIZE;
> +				p = phys + size;
> +				i = iova + size;
> +				while (i < dma->iova + dma->size &&
> +				       p == iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain, i)) {
> +					size += PAGE_SIZE;
> +					p += PAGE_SIZE;
> +					i += PAGE_SIZE;
> +				}
> +			} else {
> +				unsigned long pfn;
> +				unsigned long vaddr = dma->vaddr +
> +						     (iova - dma->iova);
> +				size_t n = dma->iova + dma->size - iova;
> +				long npage;
> +
> +				npage = vfio_pin_pages_remote(dma, vaddr,
> +							      n >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> +							      &pfn);
> +				if (npage <= 0) {
> +					WARN_ON(!npage);
> +					ret = (int)npage;
> +					return ret;
> +				}
> +
> +				phys = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +				size = npage << PAGE_SHIFT;
>  			}
>  
> -			size = PAGE_SIZE;
> -
> -			while (iova + size < dma->iova + dma->size &&
> -			       phys + size == iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain,
> -								 iova + size))
> -				size += PAGE_SIZE;
> -
>  			ret = iommu_map(domain->domain, iova, phys,
>  					size, dma->prot | domain->prot);
>  			if (ret)
> @@ -749,8 +1105,8 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>  
>  			iova += size;
>  		}
> +		dma->iommu_mapped = true;
>  	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -806,7 +1162,7 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  	struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
>  	struct vfio_group *group;
>  	struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
> -	struct bus_type *bus = NULL;
> +	struct bus_type *bus = NULL, *mdev_bus;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> @@ -818,6 +1174,13 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (iommu->external_domain) {
> +		if (find_iommu_group(iommu->external_domain, iommu_group)) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!group || !domain) {
> @@ -832,6 +1195,25 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto out_free;
>  
> +	mdev_bus = symbol_get(mdev_bus_type);
> +
> +	if (mdev_bus) {
> +		if ((bus == mdev_bus) && !iommu_present(bus)) {
> +			symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
> +			if (!iommu->external_domain) {
> +				INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
> +				iommu->external_domain = domain;
> +			} else
> +				kfree(domain);
> +
> +			list_add(&group->next,
> +				 &iommu->external_domain->group_list);
> +			mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		symbol_put(mdev_bus_type);
> +	}
> +
>  	domain->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(bus);
>  	if (!domain->domain) {
>  		ret = -EIO;
> @@ -922,6 +1304,46 @@ static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>  		vfio_remove_dma(iommu, rb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node));
>  }
>  
> +static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> +	struct rb_node *n, *p;
> +
> +	n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> +	for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> +		struct vfio_dma *dma;
> +		long locked = 0, unlocked = 0;
> +
> +		dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
> +		unlocked += vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, false);
> +		p = rb_first(&dma->pfn_list);
> +		for (; p; p = rb_next(p))
> +			locked++;

We don't know that these weren't reserved pages.  If the vendor driver
was pinning peer-to-peer ranges vfio_unmap_unpin() might have returned
0 yet we're assuming each is locked RAM, so our accounting can go
upside down.

> +		vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, locked - unlocked);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_external_unpin_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> +				    bool do_accounting)
> +{
> +	struct rb_node *n, *p;
> +
> +	n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> +	for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> +		struct vfio_dma *dma;
> +
> +		dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
> +		while ((p = rb_first(&dma->pfn_list))) {
> +			int unlocked;
> +			struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = rb_entry(p, struct vfio_pfn,
> +							 node);
> +
> +			unlocked = vfio_iova_put_vfio_pfn(dma, vpfn);
> +			if (do_accounting)
> +				vfio_lock_acct(dma->task, -unlocked);

nit, we could batch these further, only updating accounting once per
vfio_dma, or once entirely.

> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  					  struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
>  {
> @@ -931,6 +1353,26 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>  
> +	if (iommu->external_domain) {
> +		domain = iommu->external_domain;
> +		group = find_iommu_group(domain, iommu_group);
> +		if (group) {
> +			list_del(&group->next);
> +			kfree(group);
> +
> +			if (list_empty(&domain->group_list)) {
> +				if (!IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu)) {
> +					vfio_external_unpin_all(iommu, true);
> +					vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
> +				} else
> +					vfio_external_unpin_all(iommu, false);
> +				kfree(domain);
> +				iommu->external_domain = NULL;
> +			}
> +			goto detach_group_done;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
>  		group = find_iommu_group(domain, iommu_group);
>  		if (!group)
> @@ -940,21 +1382,27 @@ static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
>  		list_del(&group->next);
>  		kfree(group);
>  		/*
> -		 * Group ownership provides privilege, if the group
> -		 * list is empty, the domain goes away.  If it's the
> -		 * last domain, then all the mappings go away too.
> +		 * Group ownership provides privilege, if the group list is
> +		 * empty, the domain goes away. If it's the last domain with
> +		 * iommu and external domain doesn't exist, then all the
> +		 * mappings go away too. If it's the last domain with iommu and
> +		 * external domain exist, update accounting
>  		 */
>  		if (list_empty(&domain->group_list)) {
> -			if (list_is_singular(&iommu->domain_list))
> -				vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
> +			if (list_is_singular(&iommu->domain_list)) {
> +				if (!iommu->external_domain)
> +					vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
> +				else
> +					vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(iommu);
> +			}
>  			iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
>  			list_del(&domain->next);
>  			kfree(domain);
>  		}
> -		goto done;
> +		break;
>  	}
>  
> -done:
> +detach_group_done:
>  	mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -986,27 +1434,42 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
>  	return iommu;
>  }
>  
> +static void vfio_release_domain(struct vfio_domain *domain, bool external)
> +{
> +	struct vfio_group *group, *group_tmp;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(group, group_tmp,
> +				 &domain->group_list, next) {
> +		if (!external)
> +			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
> +		list_del(&group->next);
> +		kfree(group);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!external)
> +		iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> +}
> +
>  static void vfio_iommu_type1_release(void *iommu_data)
>  {
>  	struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
>  	struct vfio_domain *domain, *domain_tmp;
> -	struct vfio_group *group, *group_tmp;
> +
> +	if (iommu->external_domain) {
> +		vfio_release_domain(iommu->external_domain, true);
> +		vfio_external_unpin_all(iommu, false);
> +		kfree(iommu->external_domain);
> +		iommu->external_domain = NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(domain, domain_tmp,
>  				 &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> -		list_for_each_entry_safe(group, group_tmp,
> -					 &domain->group_list, next) {
> -			iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
> -			list_del(&group->next);
> -			kfree(group);
> -		}
> -		iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> +		vfio_release_domain(domain, false);
>  		list_del(&domain->next);
>  		kfree(domain);
>  	}
> -
>  	kfree(iommu);
>  }
>  
> @@ -1110,6 +1573,8 @@ static const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops vfio_iommu_driver_ops_type1 = {
>  	.ioctl		= vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl,
>  	.attach_group	= vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group,
>  	.detach_group	= vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group,
> +	.pin_pages	= vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages,
> +	.unpin_pages	= vfio_iommu_type1_unpin_pages,
>  };
>  
>  static int __init vfio_iommu_type1_init(void)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux