On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:49:19PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > Only if you emulate a crufty old parallel scsi bus, and that's just silly. > One of the nice things about scsi is it separates the command set from the > transport layer. cf. USB mass-storage, SAS, SBP2(firewire), and probably > several others I've forgotten. It has nothing to do with an SPI bus. Everything that resembles a SAM architecture can have multiple LUs per targer, and multiple targers per initiator port, so we need all the complex queing code, and we need error handling and and and. For some really simple ones like USB mass-storage we might get away with some ad-hoc SCSI CDB generation instead of real scsi stack, but I would recommend against it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
