Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On 10/11/16 19:53, Alex Bennée wrote: > > .... >> So I was re-basing my kvm-unit-tests against your GIC rework and found >> myself copy and pasting a bunch of this into my tests that fire IRQs. > > So I take it you are working on (or already have) code to test SPIs, > probably via GICD_ISPENDR? > Just asking because I was thinking about going there and thus could save > my time if you are on it already... In my case I wanted to trigger SPIs to exercise my TCG tests for MTTCG: https://github.com/stsquad/kvm-unit-tests/blob/mttcg/current-tests-v6/arm/tcg-test.c#L113 >> That makes me think the abstraction should be in the library code so >> other tests can fiddle with sending IRQs. > > ...because I was wondering the same. To answer Andrew's question from the other post I would be happy with a common: gic_enable gic_send_spi(cpu, irq) gic_irq_ack() which returns the iar. > > Cheers, > Andre. -- Alex Bennée -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
