Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] KVM: x86: virtualize cpuid faulting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Kyle Huey <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hardware support for faulting on the cpuid instruction is not required to
> emulate it, because cpuid triggers a VM exit anyways. KVM handles the relevant
> MSRs (MSR_PLATFORM_INFO and MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLE) and upon a
> cpuid-induced VM exit checks the cpuid faulting state and the CPL.
> kvm_require_cpl is even kind enough to inject the GP fault for us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey <khuey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c            |  3 +++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index bdde807..5edef7b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -592,16 +592,18 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>         u64 pat;
>
>         unsigned switch_db_regs;
>         unsigned long db[KVM_NR_DB_REGS];
>         unsigned long dr6;
>         unsigned long dr7;
>         unsigned long eff_db[KVM_NR_DB_REGS];
>         unsigned long guest_debug_dr7;
> +       bool cpuid_fault_supported;
> +       bool cpuid_fault;

Suggest storing these in MSR form:

        u64 msr_platform_info;
        u64 msr_misc_features_enables;

It will simplify the MSR get/set code, and make it easier to plumb
support for new bits in these MSRs.

>
>         u64 mcg_cap;
>         u64 mcg_status;
>         u64 mcg_ctl;
>         u64 mcg_ext_ctl;
>         u64 *mce_banks;
>
>         /* Cache MMIO info */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index afa7bbb..ed8436a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -862,16 +862,19 @@ void kvm_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx, u32 *edx)
>         trace_kvm_cpuid(function, *eax, *ebx, *ecx, *edx);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_cpuid);
>
>  void kvm_emulate_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>         u32 function, eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>
> +       if (vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault && !kvm_require_cpl(vcpu, 0))
> +               return;
> +
>         function = eax = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX);
>         ecx = kvm_register_read(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX);
>         kvm_cpuid(vcpu, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>         kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RAX, eax);
>         kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RBX, ebx);
>         kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RCX, ecx);
>         kvm_register_write(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RDX, edx);
>         kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 3017de0..9cd6462 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -986,16 +986,18 @@ static u32 emulated_msrs[] = {
>
>         MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST,
>         MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE,
>         MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
>         MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS,
>         MSR_IA32_MCG_CTL,
>         MSR_IA32_MCG_EXT_CTL,
>         MSR_IA32_SMBASE,
> +       MSR_PLATFORM_INFO,
> +       MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES,
>  };
>
>  static unsigned num_emulated_msrs;
>
>  bool kvm_valid_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 efer)
>  {
>         if (efer & efer_reserved_bits)
>                 return false;
> @@ -2269,16 +2271,29 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>                         return 1;
>                 vcpu->arch.osvw.length = data;
>                 break;
>         case MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS:
>                 if (!guest_cpuid_has_osvw(vcpu))
>                         return 1;
>                 vcpu->arch.osvw.status = data;
>                 break;
> +       case MSR_PLATFORM_INFO:
> +               if (!msr_info->host_initiated ||
> +                   data & ~PLATINFO_CPUID_FAULT ||
> +                   (!!(data & PLATINFO_CPUID_FAULT) && vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault))

Should that be a single exclamation point?

> +                       return 1;
> +               vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault_supported = !!(data & PLATINFO_CPUID_FAULT);

No need for "!!".

> +               break;
> +       case MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES:
> +               if (data & ~CPUID_FAULT_ENABLE ||
> +                   !vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault_supported)
> +                       return 1;
> +               vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault = !!(data & CPUID_FAULT_ENABLE);

No need for "!!".

> +               break;
>         default:
>                 if (msr && (msr == vcpu->kvm->arch.xen_hvm_config.msr))
>                         return xen_hvm_config(vcpu, data);
>                 if (kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr))
>                         return kvm_pmu_set_msr(vcpu, msr_info);
>                 if (!ignore_msrs) {
>                         vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "unhandled wrmsr: 0x%x data 0x%llx\n",
>                                     msr, data);
> @@ -2483,16 +2498,26 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>                         return 1;
>                 msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.osvw.length;
>                 break;
>         case MSR_AMD64_OSVW_STATUS:
>                 if (!guest_cpuid_has_osvw(vcpu))
>                         return 1;
>                 msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.osvw.status;
>                 break;
> +       case MSR_PLATFORM_INFO:
> +               msr_info->data = 0;
> +               if (vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault_supported)
> +                       msr_info->data |= PLATINFO_CPUID_FAULT;
> +               break;
> +       case MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES:
> +               msr_info->data = 0;
> +               if (vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault)
> +                       msr_info->data |= CPUID_FAULT_ENABLE;
> +               break;
>         default:
>                 if (kvm_pmu_is_valid_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index))
>                         return kvm_pmu_get_msr(vcpu, msr_info->index, &msr_info->data);
>                 if (!ignore_msrs) {
>                         vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "unhandled rdmsr: 0x%x\n", msr_info->index);
>                         return 1;
>                 } else {
>                         vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "ignored rdmsr: 0x%x\n", msr_info->index);
> @@ -7508,16 +7533,19 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>
>         kvm_clear_async_pf_completion_queue(vcpu);
>         kvm_async_pf_hash_reset(vcpu);
>         vcpu->arch.apf.halted = false;
>
>         if (!init_event) {
>                 kvm_pmu_reset(vcpu);
>                 vcpu->arch.smbase = 0x30000;
> +
> +               vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault_supported = true;
> +               vcpu->arch.cpuid_fault = false;
>         }
>
>         memset(vcpu->arch.regs, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.regs));
>         vcpu->arch.regs_avail = ~0;
>         vcpu->arch.regs_dirty = ~0;
>
>         kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_reset(vcpu, init_event);
>  }
> --
> 2.10.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux