Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 08/17] x86/vmexit: leverage pci_scan_bars()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:47:11PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> Since pci-testdev is a very specific device for QEMU, let's use the new
> pci_scan_bars() helper, and selectively choose the bars we want.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/pci.h    |  2 ++
>  x86/vmexit.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/pci.h b/lib/pci.h
> index 56b49f0..e48045c 100644
> --- a/lib/pci.h
> +++ b/lib/pci.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ int pci_testdev(void);
>   * pci-testdev supports at least three types of tests (via mmio and
>   * portio BARs): no-eventfd, wildcard-eventfd and datamatch-eventfd
>   */
> +#define PCI_TESTDEV_BAR_MEM		0
> +#define PCI_TESTDEV_BAR_IO		1

More defines that I think we could live without, but I'll try to stop
complaining about self-documenting code...

>  #define PCI_TESTDEV_NUM_BARS		2
>  #define PCI_TESTDEV_NUM_TESTS		3
>  
> diff --git a/x86/vmexit.c b/x86/vmexit.c
> index 2736ab8..880466e 100644
> --- a/x86/vmexit.c
> +++ b/x86/vmexit.c
> @@ -373,7 +373,6 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  	int i;
>  	unsigned long membar = 0;
>  	struct pci_dev pcidev;
> -	int ret;
>  
>  	smp_init();
>  	setup_vm();
> @@ -386,20 +385,14 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
>  	pm_tmr_blk = fadt->pm_tmr_blk;
>  	printf("PM timer port is %x\n", pm_tmr_blk);
>  
> -	ret = pci_find_dev(&pcidev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT,
> -			   PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_TEST);
> -	if (ret == 0) {
> -		for (i = 0; i < PCI_TESTDEV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> -			if (!pci_bar_is_valid(&pcidev, i)) {
> -				continue;
> -			}
> -			if (pci_bar_is_memory(&pcidev, i)) {
> -				membar = pci_bar_get_addr(&pcidev, i);
> -				pci_test.memaddr = ioremap(membar, PAGE_SIZE);
> -			} else {
> -				pci_test.iobar = pci_bar_get_addr(&pcidev, i);
> -			}
> -		}
> +	if (!pci_find_dev(&pcidev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT,
> +			  PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_TEST)) {
> +		pci_scan_bars(&pcidev);
> +		assert(pci_bar_is_memory(&pcidev, PCI_TESTDEV_BAR_MEM));
> +		assert(!pci_bar_is_memory(&pcidev, PCI_TESTDEV_BAR_IO));
> +		membar = pcidev.pci_bar[PCI_TESTDEV_BAR_MEM];
> +		pci_test.memaddr = ioremap(membar, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		pci_test.iobar = pcidev.pci_bar[PCI_TESTDEV_BAR_IO];
>  		printf("pci-testdev at 0x%x membar %lx iobar %x\n",
>  		       pcidev.pci_bdf, membar, pci_test.iobar);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.7.4

I'm not sure what we gain by hardcoding the mapping of these bars, besides
slightly simpler code, but lib/pci-testdev.c does it too, and it should be
quite safe, so OK.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux