On 11/02/2016 03:59 PM, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> On 10/29/2016 11:41 PM, Jike Song wrote:
>> On 10/29/2016 06:06 PM, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/29/2016 10:00 AM, Jike Song wrote:
>>>> On 10/27/2016 05:29 AM, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>>>>> +int mdev_register_device(struct device *dev, const struct parent_ops *ops)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> + struct parent_device *parent;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* check for mandatory ops */
>>>>> + if (!ops || !ops->create || !ops->remove || !ops->supported_type_groups)
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + dev = get_device(dev);
>>>>> + if (!dev)
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mutex_lock(&parent_list_lock);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Check for duplicate */
>>>>> + parent = __find_parent_device(dev);
>>>>> + if (parent) {
>>>>> + ret = -EEXIST;
>>>>> + goto add_dev_err;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + parent = kzalloc(sizeof(*parent), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> + if (!parent) {
>>>>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>>>>> + goto add_dev_err;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + kref_init(&parent->ref);
>>>>> + mutex_init(&parent->lock);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + parent->dev = dev;
>>>>> + parent->ops = ops;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = parent_create_sysfs_files(parent);
>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&parent_list_lock);
>>>>> + mdev_put_parent(parent);
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = class_compat_create_link(mdev_bus_compat_class, dev, NULL);
>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to create compatibility class link\n");
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Hi Kirti,
>>>>
>>>> Like I replied to previous version:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg139331.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jike,
>>>
>>> I saw your reply but by that time v10 version of patch series was out
>>> for review.
>>>
>>
>> Ah..yes, I forgot that :)
>>
>>>> You can always check if mdev_bus_compat_class already registered
>>>> here, and register it if not yet. Same logic should be adopted to
>>>> mdev_init.
>>>>
>>>> Current implementation will simply panic if configured as builtin,
>>>> which is rare but far from impossible.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you verify attached patch with v10 patch-set whether this works for you?
>>> I'll incorporate this change in my next version.
>>>
>>
>> Seems cool. But would you please also keep the register in mdev_init(),
>> just check the 'in case it was already registered' case? Thanks!
>>
>
> The class is used only to keep symbolic to the devices which are
> registered to mdev framework. So I think its ok to register this class
> when first device is registered.
>
That's also cool :-)
So if you like it:
Reviewed-by: Jike Song <jike.song@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Thanks,
Jike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
