On Wed 26-10-16 00:46:31, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > The holdout for unexporting __get_user_pages_unlocked() is its invocation in > mm/process_vm_access.c: process_vm_rw_single_vec(), as this definitely _does_ > seem to invoke VM_FAULT_RETRY behaviour which get_user_pages_remote() will not > trigger if we were to replace it with the latter. I am not sure I understand. Prior to 1e9877902dc7e this used get_user_pages_unlocked. What prevents us from reintroducing it with FOLL_REMOVE which was meant to be added by the above commit? Or am I missing your point? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
