RE: [PATCH 0/2] extend page_track for external usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 3:44 PM
> 
> 
> 
> On 26/10/2016 09:39, Neo Jia wrote:
> > > The page_track implementation is almost ready for external usage, my
> > > changes here are quite trivial. I guess the external user like your
> > > vendor driver can call them directly.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't think the current implementation is accessible to us,
> > could you please change?
> 
> How so?
> 
> > > BTW, do you also have to shadow the device page-tables? Per my previous
> > > understanding you don't have to.
> >
> > It is not for the page table, we have other features will require such wp
> > capabilities to trap guest memory access.
> 
> Can you please expand?
> 
> Paolo

also is it for optional features or mandatory? It's the first time we hear
similar requirement of this interface from your side...

Thanks
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux