Hi Markus,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:28 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> - if (!bp_data) {
>>> - ret = -ENOMEM;
>>> - goto error;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - if (copy_from_user(bp_data,
>>> - dbg->arch.hw_bp,
>>> - sizeof(*bp_data) * dbg->arch.nr_hw_bp)) {
>>> - ret = -EFAULT;
>>> - goto error;
>>> - }
>>> + bp_data = memdup_user(dbg->arch.hw_bp,
>>> + sizeof(*bp_data) * dbg->arch.nr_hw_bp);
>>
>> ... while this would continue silently,
>
> How do you think about to explain this information a bit more?
kmalloc_array() has a builtin check for overflow while calculating the size.
This is the real reason why it's better to use kmalloc_array() than
kzalloc(n * size). If "n * size" overflow, kzalloc(n * size) would allocate a
memory block with a bogus size.
>> and corrupt memory.
>
> I wonder about this conclusion at the moment.
>
> Did you notice the check "IS_ERR(bp_data)" and the corresponding reaction
> in this update suggestion?
Yes, but bp_data may still be a valid (as in "not an error") value.
Your commit a1708a2eaded836b ("KVM: s390: Improve determination of sizes in
kvm_s390_import_bp_data()") made the code more robust, as kmalloc_array() ha
a builtin overflow check, and will return NULL if overflow is detected.
However, commit 0624a8eb82efd58e ("KVM: s390: Use memdup_user() rather than
duplicating code") dropped that safety net again.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
