On 18/08/2016 09:49, Liang Li wrote: > The validity check for the guest line address is inefficient, > check the invalid value instead is more efficient. > > Signed-off-by: Liang Li <liang.z.li@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index a45d858..c32d5e8 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -6103,7 +6103,7 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION); > > gla_validity = (exit_qualification >> 7) & 0x3; > - if (gla_validity != 0x3 && gla_validity != 0x1 && gla_validity != 0) { > + if (gla_validity == 0x2) { > printk(KERN_ERR "EPT: Handling EPT violation failed!\n"); > printk(KERN_ERR "EPT: GPA: 0x%lx, GVA: 0x%lx\n", > (long unsigned int)vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS), > Queued for 4.9, thanks. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html