Re: [KVM PATCH v2 2/2] kvm: add support for irqfd via eventfd-notification interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gregory Haskins wrote:
This allows an eventfd to be registered as an irq source with a
guest.  Any
signaling operation on the eventfd (via userspace or kernel) will inject
the registered GSI at the next available window.

+struct kvm_irqfd {
+    __u32 fd;
+    __u32 gsi;
+};
+
I think it's better to have ioctl create and return the fd.  This way
we aren't tied to eventfd (though it makes a lot of sense to use it).

I dont mind either way, but I am not sure it buys us much as the one
driving the fd would need to understand if the interface is
eventfd-esque or something else anyway.  Let me know if you still want
to see this changed.

Sure, the interface remains the same (write 8 bytes), but the implementation can change. For example, we can implement it to work from interrupt context, once we hack the locking appropriately.


+static void
+irqfd_inject(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+    struct _irqfd *irqfd = container_of(work, struct _irqfd, work);
+    struct kvm *kvm = irqfd->kvm;
+
+    mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+    kvm_set_irq(kvm, kvm->irqfd.src, irqfd->gsi, 1);
Need to lower the irq too (though irqfd only supports edge triggered
interrupts).

Should I just do back-to-back 1+0 inside the same lock?


Yes. Might be nice to add a kvm_toggle_irq(), but let's leave that until later.

One day we'll have lockless injection and we'll want to drop this.  I
guess if we create the fd ourselves we can make it work, but I don't
see how we can do this with eventfd.


Hmm...this is a good point.  There probably is no way to use eventfd
"off the shelf" in a way that doesn't cause this callback to be in a
critical section.  Should we just worry about switching away from
eventfd when this occurs, or should I implement a custom anon-fd now?

I'd just go with eventfd, and switch when it becomes relevant. As long as the kernel allocates the fd, we're free to do as we like.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux