Re: Nested VMX security review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2016-08-16 8:23 GMT+08:00 Lars Bull <larsbull@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi, all. I work on the virtualization security team at Google. We'd
> like to start discussion on having nested VMX be considered ready for
> production, in order to have it be enabled by default, its CVEs

Interesting, what's the real scenarios can get benefit from this
feature from Google?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux