On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:29:55 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:54:39AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:37:39 +0900 > > Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > +#define VIRT_PSTORE_ORDER 2 > > > +#define VIRT_PSTORE_BUFSIZE (4096 << VIRT_PSTORE_ORDER) > > > > It may make sense to make the size of the buffer configurable through > > the config space. > > Right. I'm considering it too, but it needs a buffer larger than > kmsg_bytes (= 10K) to work properly in the current implementation. As > this version is just to verify the idea is sane and useful, I used a > fixed size buffer. Will change in the next version. Sure, that makes sense for a prototype. We can guard any config space entry with a feature bit, but this one makes sense to add from the beginning. > > Speaking of the standard: I think it makes sense to at least reserve a > > device id for pstore, as the idea is sound. Maybe prepare a patch to > > the standard as well if you have time? > > I'd love to. As I mentioned earlier, I don't have enough knowledge in > this area. Could you please provide some links about how can I do that? See the virtio page at OASIS (https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=virtio) for a link to our subversion (yes...) repository. Just do two patches: one to reserve a device id, and one that specifies how device and driver work. (For examples, look at the proposed device types that have been posted to the virtualization lists, e.g. virtio-crypto or virtio-sdm). You just need to be patient, we're currently a bit stalled... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html