Re: Re: Is guest OS oriented scheduling welcome?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:49 PM, alex <tomorrowanewday@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I tested the CFS in detail, according to Documentation/sched-design-CFS.txt
>
>   I found it does not work.  Is this a bug to CFS?
>

I reviewed my experiment, and found a mistake there.
The CFS is OK.

But the information shown from 'top' reveals that the jitter is somewhat great.

>   And I found CFS does not reserve cpu usage. That is to say, when
> none else is active, the active one can take all the cpu time.
this statement holds.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux