On 6/23/2016 2:59 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> -static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> > +static int vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> > {
>> > if (vdev->acpihid)
>> > - return;
>> > + return vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(vdev) ? 0 : -ENOENT;
>> >
>> > vdev->of_reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
>> > &vdev->reset_module);
>> > @@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> > vdev->of_reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
>> > &vdev->reset_module);
>> > }
>> > +
>> > + return vdev->of_reset ? 0 : -ENOENT;
>> > }
> nit, this looks more like a:
>
> static bool vfio_platform_has_reset(...)
> ...
> return vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset() == 0;
>
> ...
>
> return vdev->of_reset != NULL
>
Sorry, I didn't understand this comment. The code has get and put functions for DT.
These functions are not useful for ACPI. This is the reason for the above change.
Can you be more specific?
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
