On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:43:49PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> I see. If you have an useful use case for it, we may consider
> that. But first I would like to see an actual case where a
> feature was not added to GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID yet, but would not
> crash and burn if forcibly enabled by QEMU.
Ok.
> I mean live migration to a different host (that normally has the
> same CPU vendor). When you live-migrate or use savevm, you need
> to send the machine state to the other host. This is implemented
> using VMStateDescription structs describing the data to be
> migrated. See vmstate_x86_cpu in target-i386/machine.c, for
> example.
>
> You need additional migration sections if the feature introduces
> additional state (e.g. CPU registers) that need to be migrated
> too, to keep the feature working. If there's new state but no
> migration support is implemented yet, you need to add the feature
> to unmigratable_flags.
>
> For an example where no additional state is introduced by new
> features, see:
Thanks for the examples and the explanation - I see the deal now.
Ok, I'll go through the features and see what kind of state the kernel
programs in there and add them to a VMStateDescription thing. Hohumm,
makes sense to me.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
