On 06/07/2016 06:02, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> May I ask you what the exact issue you have with this interface for >>>> Intel to support >>>> your own GPU virtualization? >>> >>> Intel's vGPU can work with this framework. We really appreciate your >>> / nvidia's >>> contribution. >> >> Then, I don't think we should embargo Paolo's patch. > > This patchset is specific for the framework design, i.e, mapping memory when > fault happens rather than mmap(), and this design is exact what we are > discussing for nearly two days. I disagree, this patch fixes a bug because what Neo is doing is legal. It may not be the design that will be committed, but the bug they found in KVM is real. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
