Re: TSC deadline timer in guests vs. migration?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:51:41AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:45:06PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:30:08PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 01:01:42PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > > Can bad things happen if a guest using the TSC deadline timer is
> > > > migrated?  The guest doesn't re-calibrate the TSC after migration, and
> > > > the TSC frequency can and will change unless your data center is
> > > > perfectly homogeneous.
> > > 
> > > It can fire earlier if the destination runs at a higher frequency.
> > > It will fire past the configured time if the destination runs at a slower frequency.
> > > 
> > > Suppose the first case is worse.
> > > 
> > > Should convert the expiration time to nanoseconds i suppose, and then 
> > > convert back on the destination.
> > 
> > This won't make any difference if the guest sets up a new timer
> > after migration (but using the old TSC frequency), will it?
> 
> It does, because the timer setup traps to the host, where you can
> convert it to the proper value:

To convert it to the proper value, you need to know what's the
TSC frequency the guest is assuming. How would you do that?

-- 
Eduardo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux