On 04/07/2016 09:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>> But apart from this, it's much more obvious to consider the refcount.
>> The x86 MMU code doesn't care if the page is reserved or not;
>> mmu_set_spte does a kvm_release_pfn_clean, hence it makes sense for
>> hva_to_pfn_remapped to try doing a get_page (via kvm_get_pfn) after
>> invoking the fault handler, just like the get_user_pages family of
>> function does.
>
> Well, it's little strange as you always try to get refcont
> for a PFNMAP region without MIXEDMAP which indicates all the memory
> in this region is no 'struct page' backend.
Fair enough, I can modify the comment.
/*
* In case the VMA has VM_MIXEDMAP set, whoever called remap_pfn_range
* is also going to call e.g. unmap_mapping_range before the underlying
* non-reserved pages are freed, which will then call our MMU notifier.
* We still have to get a reference here to the page, because the callers
* of *hva_to_pfn* and *gfn_to_pfn* ultimately end up doing a
* kvm_release_pfn_clean on the returned pfn. If the pfn is
* reserved, the kvm_get_pfn/kvm_release_pfn_clean pair will simply
* do nothing.
*/
Paolo
> But it works as kvm_{get, release}_* have already been aware of
> reserved_pfn, so i am okay with it......
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
