Re: [PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2016年06月30日 23:45, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:45:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>Hi all:
>
>This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to
>eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The
>conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use
>it instead of sk_receive_queue.
>
>A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to
>use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through:
>
>- add the ability to resize multiple rings at once to avoid handling
>   partial resize failure for mutiple rings.
>- add the support for zero length ring.
>- introduce a notifier which was triggered when tx_queue_len was
>   changed for a netdev.
>- resize all queues during the tx_queue_len changing.
>
>Tests shows about 15% improvement on guest rx pps:
>
>Before: ~1300000pps
>After : ~1500000pps
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-from-altitude: 34697 feet.

Wow, thanks a lot!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux