On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:54:26 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jesper, Jason, I know that both of you tested this, > please post Tested-by tags for whatever was tested. Yes, I tested this via "external" kernel modules, not your framework. I have verified that this V8 patchset is equivalent, to what I have in: https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/ (at 81ca09c2a945) > changes since v7 > fix typos noticed by Jesper Brouer You also fixed a missing _bh ... I verified you also included this fix ;-) https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/commit/24da4f495bb > changes since v6 > resize implemented. peek/full calls are no longer lockless > > replaced _FIELD macros with _CALL which invoke a function > on the pointer rather than just returning a value > > destroy now scans the array and frees all queued skbs > > changes since v5 > implemented a generic ptr_ring api, and > made skb_array a type-safe wrapper > apis for taking the spinlock in different contexts > following expected usecase in tun Tested-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
