On 05/06/2016 05:28, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> > No, I don't think so, the existing req_immediate_exit case is only after >> > a VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME vmexit, in which case we already have a >> > >> > if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending) >> > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu); >> > >> > in vmx_vcpu_run. > Do you think this can be removed since it blindly request a > KVM_REQ_EVENT even if there is no still-pending event to L1 which > blocked by nested_run_pending, however, req_immediate_exit can > indicate there is a pending event blocked by nested_run_pending and > the request KVM_REQUEST_EVENT added in your patch can guarantee inject > this pending event in the next nested vmexit. Yes, I think so. Thanks, Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
