On 05/18/2016 07:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 18/05/2016 18:26, Emmanuel Lacour wrote: >> Thanks, it's a bad news for us :( >> >> I will try to play with cgroups io throttling to limit by iops or bytes >> read, but it'll be a hard limit rather than a priority :( > > That probably won't work either, but you can use io throttling on the > host too. > >> Do you think there could be back some io priority throttling in not so >> far future kernels? > > I wouldn't oppose a patch to add back the non-mq path, but as far as I > know nobody is working on it. It's not hard and I can help if you need > guidance. > > Adding I/O scheduler support to blk-mq has been promised for at least a > year now, but I'm not aware of which kernel release might have the work. > It's not even been submitted to LKML, so I guess it's quite far away. What actually happened to the virtio-blk multiqueue support in QEMU? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
