Re: [kvm-unit-tests Patch V2] x86: Makefile refine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/05/2016 11:16, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:09:49AM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/05/2016 15:18, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> In x86 Makefile, each elf target has a rule for its dependent, which shares
>>> the same pattern. We could let makefile to handle this job instead of
>>> writing a specific rule for each elf target. By doing so, the makefile rule
>>> looks clear and would be easy for adding new cases.
>>>
>>> This patch does several cleanup:
>>> 1. add $(cstart.o) in *.elf dependent
>>> 2. remove all those elf rules which share the same pattern
>>> 3. remove the *.o dependent in the elf rule who has extra dependent
>>> 4. move the vmx.elf rule to Makefile.x86_64 since this is not a common case
>>> 5. remove elf rules in Makefile.i386
>>> 6. Add %.elf and %.o in .PRECIOUS to keep them after make
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>>    add .PRECIOUS special target to keep those intermediate files
>>
>> I think keeping the .o is useless, as it will be recreated each time
>> (the source changes).
> 
> The .o's may be useful for disassembly.

You can generate them on demand, for instance:

make x86/vmexit.o

>>
>> If .elf need to be kept, they should be in the targets, something like:
> 
> The elfs are definitely useful for disassembly.
> 
>>
>> -- a/x86/Makefile.x86_64
>> +++ b/x86/Makefile.x86_64
>> @@ -6,14 +6,19 @@ CFLAGS += -mno-red-zone
>>  cflatobjs += lib/x86/setjmp64.o
>>
>>  tests = $(TEST_DIR)/access.flat $(TEST_DIR)/apic.flat \
>> +          $(TEST_DIR)/access.elf $(TEST_DIR)/apic.elf \
>>           $(TEST_DIR)/emulator.flat $(TEST_DIR)/idt_test.flat \
>> +         $(TEST_DIR)/emulator.elf $(TEST_DIR)/idt_test.elf \
>> ...
> 
> This is ugly.
> 
>>
>> We don't need some magic here.
> 
> Why choose ugliness over a special make target?

What is ugly or beautiful is a question of point of view :)

I like to rely on explicit rules rather than on an obscure GNU make
property.

But it is just my opinion, so let's go with ".PRECIOUS"

Laurent

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux