From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> While we can not fully fence of the Nonquiescing Key-Setting facility, we should as try our best to hide it. Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c index 3561119..3137479 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -670,8 +670,9 @@ static int handle_pfmf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_RESERVED) return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); - /* Only provide non-quiescing support if the host supports it */ - if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_NQ && !test_facility(14)) + /* Only provide non-quiescing support if enabled for the guest */ + if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_NQ && + !test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 14)) return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION); /* No support for conditional-SSKE */ -- 2.5.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
