Avi Kivity wrote: > > The comment about repeating 'mov ss' in the manual has that wonderful > word in it, May. That means we're perfectly allowed to ignore it and > just set the flag unconditionally. > Realistically, though, this should only be done for a limited number of sequential instructions. > I doubt we'll ever see a repeated 'mov ss', once is more than enough. True enough, except maliciously. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
