On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:21:30AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 25/04/16 20:49, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:15:25PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > >> Hi Andre, > >> > >> I'm just randomly jumping in here because I spotted a typo in $SUBJECT. > >> 'accessor' has too many c's. Also, just curious, but if the author is > >> from Linaro (hi Christoffer), then why do the new files this patch adds > >> have ARM copyrights? > >> > > > > We just decided to let ARM deal with asserting the license since we all > > collaborated on it, but others also suggested that we should let ARM and > > Linaro share the license. > > I personally have no objections to having both ARM and Linaro sharing > the copyright, but I just don't know how this works in practice (and > asking any legal department is a sure recipe to delay these patches for > an extra 6 months, give or take a few years). > > In the end, all I care about is the licence under which the code is > released. > Thanks, my curiosity is satisfied. I fully agree that if it's not easy to share a collaborated file, then it's just a matter of flipping a coin, or defaulting to whichever has the majority. drew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html