AW: AW: AW: AW: KVM performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,
the host runs on a Dual-Core AMD Opteron Processor.
Does there exist a similar AMD parameter?

Regard Stefanie

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Avi Kivity [mailto:avi@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Gesendet: Samstag, 11. April 2009 18:19
An: BRAUN, Stefanie
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: KVM performance

BRAUN, Stefanie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> now I was able to start the guest vmu with disk virtio, and some of 
> the tests with disk involvement even improved a bit.
> But the test in which a logo is added to the video stream does not 
> improve. I don't know why the performance is so bad?
>
> Subtest: Reading video locally, adding a logo to the video stream and 
> then saving the video locally
> 		Host performance: 		50%
>             kvm process in host (top) : 	99%
> 		vlc process in vmu (top) : 	99%
>
>
> The output of kvm_stat -1 during the subtest is the following:
>
> efer_reload                    0         0
> exits                    9913473      3994
>   


This indicates that kvm is running in guest mode all of the time and is therefore quite efficient.  Perhaps the test uses sse instructions which kvm doesn't expose?  Try adding -cpu core2duo to the command line.

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux