On 22.04.2016 16:54, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arm/selftest.c | 14 +++++++-------
> arm/spinlock-test.c | 2 +-
> lib/argv.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arm/selftest.c b/arm/selftest.c
> index 75dc91faab69a..5656f2bb1cc88 100644
> --- a/arm/selftest.c
> +++ b/arm/selftest.c
> @@ -324,25 +324,25 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> report_prefix_push("selftest");
>
> - if (!argc)
> + if (argc < 2)
> report_abort("no test specified");
>
> - report_prefix_push(argv[0]);
> + report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
>
> - if (strcmp(argv[0], "setup") == 0) {
> + if (strcmp(argv[1], "setup") == 0) {
>
> - check_setup(argc-1, &argv[1]);
> + check_setup(argc-2, &argv[2]);
>
> - } else if (strcmp(argv[0], "vectors-kernel") == 0) {
> + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "vectors-kernel") == 0) {
>
> check_vectors(NULL);
>
> - } else if (strcmp(argv[0], "vectors-user") == 0) {
> + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "vectors-user") == 0) {
>
> start_usr(check_vectors, NULL,
> (unsigned long)thread_stack_alloc());
>
> - } else if (strcmp(argv[0], "smp") == 0) {
> + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "smp") == 0) {
>
> int cpu;
>
> diff --git a/arm/spinlock-test.c b/arm/spinlock-test.c
> index fd2af9fd2f4d3..6009ba087e4b4 100644
> --- a/arm/spinlock-test.c
> +++ b/arm/spinlock-test.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> int cpu;
>
> - if (argc && strcmp(argv[0], "bad") != 0) {
> + if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "bad") != 0) {
> lock_ops.lock = gcc_builtin_lock;
> lock_ops.unlock = gcc_builtin_unlock;
> } else {
> diff --git a/lib/argv.c b/lib/argv.c
> index 62dd1fd4cf980..1c6c6a44c836d 100644
> --- a/lib/argv.c
> +++ b/lib/argv.c
> @@ -34,9 +34,17 @@ void __setup_args(void)
>
> void setup_args(char *args)
> {
> - if (!args)
> - return;
> + if (args) {
> + __args = args;
> + __setup_args();
>
> - __args = args;
> - __setup_args();
> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> + for (int i = __argc; i > 0; --i)
Declaring a variable within a for statement is C++ style ... but since
it is used in a couple of places of kvm-unit-test already, I assume this
is ok?
> + __argv[i] = __argv[i-1];
> +#endif
> + }
> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> + __argv[0] = NULL; //HACK: just reserve argv[0] for now
> + ++__argc;
> +#endif
> }
Looks fine to me (apart from that C++ nit ;-))
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
