Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: move vcpu id checking to archs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:25:38 +0200
Greg Kurz <gkurz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Radim !
> 
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:36:11 +0200
> Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 2016-04-21 18:45+0200, Greg Kurz:  
> > > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:00:19 +0200
> > > Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    
> > >> 2016-04-21 16:20+0200, Greg Kurz:    
[...]
> > >                                                                      maybe later
> > > if we have other scenarios where vcpu ids need to cross the limit ?    
> > 
> > x86 is going to have that soon too -- vcpu_id will be able to range from
> > 0 to 2^32-1 (or 2^31), but MAX_CPUS related data structures probably
> > won't be improved to actually scale, so MAX_CPUS will remain lower.
> >  
That's not true, x86 is going to stick with KVM_MAX_VCPUS/qemu's max_cpus,
the only thing that is going to change is that max supported APIC ID
value will be in range 0 to 2^32-1 vs current 8bit one
and since APIC ID is not vcpu_id so it won't affect vcpu_id.
 
> 
> Do you have some pointers to share so that we can see the broader picture ?
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> --
> Greg
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux