2016-04-06 10:21+0800, rhett rhett: > 8499907b52c9cebf3c1a4aaa63b84bd9c3c1ff3d > arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > index 01bd7b7..e831032 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c > @@ -807,7 +807,6 @@ static int kvm_hv_set_msr_pw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 > msr, u64 data, > gfn << HV_X64_MSR_TSC_REFERENCE_ADDRESS_SHIFT, > &tsc_ref, sizeof(tsc_ref))) > return 1; > - mark_page_dirty(kvm, gfn); > break; > } > case HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_P0 ... HV_X64_MSR_CRASH_P4: > > > i think the mark_page_dirty is unnecessary, because the page had been mark > as dirty inside the > kvm_write_guest routinue. Yes, good catch. > so , can this patch be accepted ? An acceptable patch needs to follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches, would you like to make the submission? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
