On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:10:49PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> >> + /* may be already stopped by a PMI*/
> >> + if (!(ctl & RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN))
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + ctl ^= RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN;
> >
> > Would that not be much less confusing when written like |= ?
>
> This one's actually clearing TraceEn, see the if-not-set-leave in front
> of it, but that just goes to prove your point I guess. :)
Hehe, indeed. So much for pretending to be awake :-)
> How about this then:
Looks good, however:
> + if (test_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_VMX)) {
Borislav tells me this ought to be boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_VMX)
> + /* Intel SDM, 36.5 "Tracing post-VMXON" */
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC, reg);
> + if (reg & BIT(14))
> + pt_pmu.vmx = true;
> + }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
