Re: [PART1 RFC v2 06/10] svm: Add interrupt injection via AVIC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2016-03-07 16:36+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 04/03/2016 21:46, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> +static void svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vec)
>> +{
>> +	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>> +
>> +	kvm_lapic_set_vector(vec, avic_get_bk_page_entry(svm, APIC_IRR));

(I think that smp_mb here would make sense, even though we're fine now
 thanks to re-checking vcpu->mode in kvm_vcpu_kick.
 A comment explaining this optimization would be nice.  I'm thinking
 about a race where we don't send the doorbell even though the VCPU is
 in guest mode, because vcpu->mode was read before writing APIC_IRR.)

>> +
>> +	if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
>> +		wrmsrl(SVM_AVIC_DOORBELL,
>> +		       __default_cpu_present_to_apicid(vcpu->cpu));
>> +	} else {
>> +		kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
>> +	}
> 
> You also need to add
> 
> 	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> 
> before the "if", similar to vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt.

KVM won't do anything in KVM_REQ_EVENT and I think that the request can
be avoided because KVM already has to handle IRR writes from AVIC.

And what about
  [...]
  else if (!vcpu->...->is_running)
  	kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);

?
The kick isn't needed unless the VCPU is scheduled out.

Or maybe just
  if (vcpu->...->is_running)
    wrmsrl()
  else
    kvm_vcpu_kick();
?
Which doesn't use the information we have on top AVIC, making our logic
a bit simpler.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux