On 02/28/2016 10:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:42:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive >> > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time >> > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Looks good overall, but I still see one problem. > >> > --- >> > drivers/vhost/net.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 14 ++++++++ >> > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 1 + >> > include/uapi/linux/vhost.h | 6 ++++ >> > 4 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c >> > index 9eda69e..c91af93 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c >> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c >> > @@ -287,6 +287,44 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, bool success) >> > rcu_read_unlock_bh(); >> > } >> > >> > +static inline unsigned long busy_clock(void) >> > +{ >> > + return local_clock() >> 10; >> > +} >> > + >> > +static bool vhost_can_busy_poll(struct vhost_dev *dev, >> > + unsigned long endtime) >> > +{ >> > + return likely(!need_resched()) && >> > + likely(!time_after(busy_clock(), endtime)) && >> > + likely(!signal_pending(current)) && >> > + !vhost_has_work(dev) && >> > + single_task_running(); > So I find it quite unfortunate that this still uses single_task_running. > This means that for example a SCHED_IDLE task will prevent polling from > becoming active, and that seems like a bug, or at least > an undocumented feature :). Yes, it may need more thoughts. > > Unfortunately this logic affects the behaviour as observed > by userspace, so we can't merge it like this and tune > afterwards, since otherwise mangement tools will start > depending on this logic. > > How about remove single_task_running() first here and optimize on top? We probably need something like this to handle overcommitment. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html