On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:34:59AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > On 29/01/16 02:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > index c169c6444637..305c05cc249a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > > @@ -47,6 +47,18 @@ > > > > static bool vring_use_dma_api(void) > > { > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86) && defined(CONFIG_XEN) > > + /* > > + * In theory, it's possible to have a buggy QEMU-supposed > > + * emulated Q35 IOMMU and Xen enabled at the same time. On > > + * such a configuration, virtio has never worked and will > > + * not work without an even larger kludge. Instead, enable > > + * the DMA API if we're a Xen guest, which at least allows > > + * all of the sensible Xen configurations to work correctly. > > + */ > > + return static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XENPV); > > You want: > > if (xen_domain()) > return true; > > Without the #if so we use the DMA API for all types of Xen guest on all > architectures. > > David I doubt HVM domains can have virtio devices. -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html