Hi all! I have been experimenting with alternative virtio ring layouts, in order to speed up single stream performance. I have just posted a benchmark I wrote for the purpose, and a (partial) alternative layout implementation. This achieves 20-40% reduction in virtio overhead in the (default) polling mode. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.virtualization/26889 The layout is trying to be as simple as possible, to reduce the number of cache lines bouncing between CPUs. For benchmarking, the idea is to emulate virtio in user-space, artificially adding overhead for e.g. signalling to match what happens in case of a VM. I'd be very curious to get feedback on this, in particular, some people discussed using vectored operations to format virtio ring - would it conflict with this work? You are all welcome to post enhancements or more layout alternatives as patches. TODO: - documentation+discussion of interaction with CPU caching - thorough benchmarking of different configurations/hosts - experiment with event index replacements - better emulate vmexit/vmentry cost overhead - virtio spec proposal Thanks! -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
