Hi Mario,
I spotted one more potential issue...
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 01:54:55PM -0800, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> Add helper functions to enable access to fp/smid on guest entry and save host
> fpexc on vcpu put, check if fp/simd registers are dirty and add new vcpu
> fields.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Smarduch <m.smarduch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 8 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 3095df0..d4d9da1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_mmio.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
> +#include <asm/vfp.h>
> +#include "../vfp/vfpinstr.h"
>
> unsigned long *vcpu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 reg_num);
> unsigned long *vcpu_spsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -255,4 +257,44 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VFPv3
> +/* Called from vcpu_load - save fpexc and enable guest access to fp/simd unit */
> +static inline void vcpu_trap_vfp_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u32 fpexc;
> +
> + /* Save host fpexc, and enable guest access to fp unit */
> + fpexc = fmrx(FPEXC);
> + vcpu->arch.host_fpexc = fpexc;
> + fpexc |= FPEXC_EN;
> + fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc);
> +
> + /* Configure HCPTR to trap on tracing and fp/simd access */
> + vcpu->arch.hcptr = HCPTR_TTA | HCPTR_TCP(10) | HCPTR_TCP(11);
> +}
> +
> +/* Called from vcpu_put - restore host fpexc */
> +static inline void vcpu_restore_host_fpexc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + fmxr(FPEXC, vcpu->arch.host_fpexc);
> +}
> +
> +/* If trap bits are reset then fp/simd registers are dirty */
> +static inline bool vcpu_vfp_isdirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return !(vcpu->arch.hcptr & (HCPTR_TCP(10) | HCPTR_TCP(11)));
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void vcpu_trap_vfp_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + vcpu->arch.hcptr = HCPTR_TTA;
Is it correct not to trap VFP registers when the host kernel does not
have CONFIG_VFPv3? I think this is a change in functionality compared
to the current kernels is it not?
Thanks,
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
