On 01/05/2016 05:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > smp_mb on vcpu destroy isn't paired with anything, violating pairing > rules, and seems to be useless. > > Drop it. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied. (I had to fix this up a little to match kvm/next) Thanks > --- > > Untested. > > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > index 8465892..7305d2c 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > @@ -1195,7 +1195,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > (__u64) vcpu->arch.sie_block) > vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sda = 0; > } > - smp_mb(); > > if (kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm)) > gmap_free(vcpu->arch.gmap); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
