Re: Is kvm-kmod still supported?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:16:13AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28/12/2015 23:09, Estrada, Zachary J wrote:
> > I've been maintaining a fork for research and tinkering. Is the kvm-kmod
> > standalone module still supported or should I be using the full Linux
> > tree? I find kvm-kmod convenient to keep the source independent of the
> > kernel tree, but I also want to be using the latest and greatest.
> > 
> > The repository I'm referring to is here:
> > http://git.kiszka.org/?p=kvm-kmod.git;a=summary
> > 
> > However, the "next" branch appears to be out of sync with the latest
> > upstream in the Linux tree.
> 
> I'm using it occasionally and I have patches that bring it up to date,
> but only with recent base kernel versions (3.10+ *should* work).
> 
> Paolo

Got it, found this on github:
https://github.com/bonzini/kvm-kmod.git

Thanks so much!
--Zak
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux