On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 01:30:23PM -0600, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:53:36PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: > > We can now explicitly mark a unit-test as skipped. > > If all unit-tests were skipped, the whole test is reported as skipped as > > well. This also includes the case where no tests were run, but still > > ended with report_summary(). > > > > When the whole test is skipped, ./run_tests.sh prints yellow "SKIP" > > instead of green "PASS". > > > > Return value of 77 is used to please Autotools. I also renamed few > > things in reporting code and chose to refactor a logic while at it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2: > > - turned skip into yellow SKIP [Drew] > > - wrapped line at 80 characters [Drew] > > - added static to va_report > > > > lib/libcflat.h | 1 + > > lib/report.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > scripts/run.bash | 12 +++++++----- > > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h > > index 9747ccdbc9f1..070818354ee1 100644 > > --- a/lib/libcflat.h > > +++ b/lib/libcflat.h > > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ void report_prefix_push(const char *prefix); > > void report_prefix_pop(void); > > void report(const char *msg_fmt, bool pass, ...); > > void report_xfail(const char *msg_fmt, bool xfail, bool pass, ...); > > +void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...); > > int report_summary(void); > > > > #define ARRAY_SIZE(_a) (sizeof(_a)/sizeof((_a)[0])) > > diff --git a/lib/report.c b/lib/report.c > > index 35e664108a92..a47f2e00b529 100644 > > --- a/lib/report.c > > +++ b/lib/report.c > > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ > > #include "libcflat.h" > > #include "asm/spinlock.h" > > > > -static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures; > > +static unsigned int tests, failures, xfailures, skipped; > > static char prefixes[256]; > > static struct spinlock lock; > > > > @@ -43,25 +43,28 @@ void report_prefix_pop(void) > > spin_unlock(&lock); > > } > > > > -void va_report_xfail(const char *msg_fmt, bool xfail, bool cond, va_list va) > > +static void va_report(const char *msg_fmt, bool pass, bool xfail, bool skip, > > + va_list va) > > Making this static disallows unit test writers to create their own > variable arg report() wrapper functions. Perhaps to determine whether > or not a skip is in order, e.g. > > xyz_report(msg, pass, ...) > { > va_list va; > va_start(va, pass); > if (xyz) > va_report(msg, pass, false, false, va); > else > va_report(msg, false, false, true, va); > va_end(va); > } Hmm, while I still think we should avoid using static, to allow new wrappers, the wrapper I wrote here as an example wouldn't be necessary if report_skip's inputs were instead void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, bool pass, bool skip, ...) Why not do that? > > > { > > - char *pass = xfail ? "XPASS" : "PASS"; > > - char *fail = xfail ? "XFAIL" : "FAIL"; > > char buf[2000]; > > + char *prefix = skip ? "SKIP" > > + : xfail ? (pass ? "XPASS" : "XFAIL") > > + : (pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL"); > > > > spin_lock(&lock); > > > > tests++; > > - printf("%s: ", cond ? pass : fail); > > + printf("%s: ", prefix); > > puts(prefixes); > > vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), msg_fmt, va); > > puts(buf); > > puts("\n"); > > - if (xfail && cond) > > - failures++; > > - else if (xfail) > > + > > + if (skip) > > + skipped++; > > + else if (xfail && !pass) > > xfailures++; > > - else if (!cond) > > + else if (xfail || !pass) > > failures++; > > > > spin_unlock(&lock); > > @@ -71,7 +74,7 @@ void report(const char *msg_fmt, bool pass, ...) > > { > > va_list va; > > va_start(va, pass); > > - va_report_xfail(msg_fmt, false, pass, va); > > + va_report(msg_fmt, pass, false, false, va); > > va_end(va); > > } > > > > @@ -79,7 +82,15 @@ void report_xfail(const char *msg_fmt, bool xfail, bool pass, ...) > > { > > va_list va; > > va_start(va, pass); > > - va_report_xfail(msg_fmt, xfail, pass, va); > > + va_report(msg_fmt, pass, xfail, false, va); > > + va_end(va); > > +} > > + > > +void report_skip(const char *msg_fmt, ...) > > +{ > > + va_list va; > > + va_start(va, msg_fmt); > > + va_report(msg_fmt, false, false, true, va); > > va_end(va); > > } > > > > @@ -89,9 +100,14 @@ int report_summary(void) > > > > printf("\nSUMMARY: %d tests, %d unexpected failures", tests, failures); > > if (xfailures) > > - printf(", %d expected failures\n", xfailures); > > - else > > - printf("\n"); > > + printf(", %d expected failures", xfailures); > > + if (skipped) > > + printf(", %d skipped", skipped); > > + printf("\n"); > > + > > + if (tests == skipped) > > + return 77; /* blame AUTOTOOLS */ > > + > > return failures > 0 ? 1 : 0; > > > > spin_unlock(&lock); > > diff --git a/scripts/run.bash b/scripts/run.bash > > index 243586c6d2fc..b92611c29fbb 100644 > > --- a/scripts/run.bash > > +++ b/scripts/run.bash > > @@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ function run() > > # Unit-tests' return value is shifted by one. > > ret=$(($? >> 1)) > > > > - if [ $ret -eq 0 ]; then > > - echo -e "\e[32mPASS\e[0m $1" > > - else > > - echo -e "\e[31mFAIL\e[0m $1" > > - fi > > + case $ret in > > + 0) echo -ne "\e[32mPASS\e[0m" ;; > > + 77) echo -ne "\e[33mSKIP\e[0m" ;; > > + *) echo -ne "\e[31mFAIL\e[0m" > > + esac > > + > > + echo " $1" > > While touching this, please change this to $testname, and anything > else in run() that still uses $N instead of its local var name. > > > > > return $ret > > } > > -- > > 2.6.4 > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html